• Home
  • Physics
  • Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Essay Example

  • Category:
    Physics
  • Document type:
    Assignment
  • Level:
    Masters
  • Page:
    2
  • Words:
    1275

3Vaccination

Vaccination Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The conclusion of this article is that people should stop vaccinating their children altogether or they should delay the vaccination of their children until they are older. It proposes that by waiting more research will have produced evidence that can support the decision to vaccinate a child or not. The author builds his argument against vaccination around six reasons. In the fourth paragraph the author claims he has never vaccinated her child and would not even do so in the face of a pandemic.

In the introduction the author shows his intention to present an argument by urging people to make the decision to vaccinate independent of their physician’s opinion. According to the author some physicians hold a different position on vaccination from that of the Australian Medical Association; she says “your doctor is simply parroting the standard line about vaccination from the Australian (AMA) playbook” (Sarah 2010). In the following paragraph, the author urges readers to make an educated decision while deciding to vaccinate or not. According to the author the decision to vaccinate should not be based on the assumption it is dangerous just because a neighbor said so. The author goes on to advice those who decide not to vaccinate their children to make an informed decision. The author argument sets to give six supporting points why children shouldn’t be vaccinated.

The author’s first supporting argument is an assertion that Pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines cannot be trusted. He argues that Pharmaceutical companies have for years sold “unsafe and downright dangerous drugs to the public” as long as they were making profits (Sarah 2010). This argument is supported by an example about Hormone Replacement Therapy which had been used for over 40 years as the standard of care for menopausal women. This example is supported by data and statistics that show the breast cancer risk of women on HRT is double while that of stroke increase by 41 per cent. She also claims that the risk of heart attack increases by 29 per cent. However, this statistics are weak as the author does not support his claim with sources. The author makes use of repetition in the phrase; “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me” (Sarah 2010). The argument against pharmaceutical companies is further compared to a witness who lacks credibility in a court of law. According to Sarah (2010) the opinion of Pharmaceutical companies is clouded by money and profit.

Secondly, the author claims that Vaccines are made using ingredients that are harmful to a person’s health. The author lists a number of chemicals and associates them with a range of health problems. Some of the chemicals listed include formaldehyde which is used in embalming and which she claims causes cancer. The author also list Aluminum which is associated with seizures and Alzheimer’s disease. Others include Glycerine which the author claims is a cause of Kidney, liver, lung damage, death and gastrointestinal damage. According to Sarah (2010) Thimerosol a very dangerous preservative is still used in vaccines today, he says that Thimerosol has been associated with severe damage of the neural system and may result in the autoimmune disease. This part of the argument is also weak as it does not contain sources to validate these ingredients of vaccines are harmful. At some point the author makes the assumption that since Thimerosol was used in preserving vaccines it is also used to do the same today.

The author’s argument here flows logically as she first presents the alleged harmful ingredients that are usually part of the ingredients used to manufacture vaccines. Then he goes on to show they are used by injecting them into a child’s blood. She then concludes that moms who have already vaccinated their children regret their decision to vaccinate as she equals it to injecting a cocktail of poisons into a child’s bloodstream.

In her third reason for saying no to Vaccines, the author claims that vaccinated children are unhealthy and are afflicted by chronic diseases. The author starts this argument by noting that there have been no studies to compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated. The author makes the assumption that such studies have not been done as they would find the unvaccinated children healthier than vaccinated children. He urges people to take an informal poll of their neighborhood and they will find that kids with ADHD, asthma, allergies, coordination and other gross motor issues are right on track with their vaccination schedule. This argument also lacks validity as it is based on the authors own assumption and lacks supporting sources.

According to the Author some countries like Japan have woken up to the reality of the dangers of vaccine forms the author’s fourth premise for campaigning against vaccination. The author claims that the infant mortality rate in Japan has dropped since they raised their vaccination age to 2 years. The author also uses the example of where Flu vaccination was suspended in Australia after children developed serious complication a few hours after taking a shot. However, the information on falling infant mortality rates in Japan due to a raise in vaccination age is not validated by credible sources. In comparison the example of Flu vaccination suspension can be validated as it seems to be a story that appeared in the new. This premise is argued clearly and logically although the claims lack any strong supporting argument.

The fifth reason given by the author is that a number of existing vaccines have failed. The author purports to give a list of these vaccines but then ask the public to volunteer with the names of the faulty vaccines. It is not logical for the authors to say she has a list of harmful vaccines them ask the readers to help her list a number of vaccines that have proved to be faulty. However, the author gives the Gardasil vaccine which has been seen to cause slurred speech, fainting and paralysis as an example of a vaccine that has causes adverse reactions among its users. However, the example’s credibility cannot be validated as it does not cite any sources.

The author’s final premise against vaccination is that once you get vaccinated you cannot undo the harm caused in your body. She advises that vaccination should be delayed until a child immune system is sufficiently developed to handle the onslaught of the vaccine. She bases this argument on the fact that a child’s immunity continues developing as they age. Although the argument presented is logical its validity is in dispute as there are no sources supporting this conclusion.

Conclusion

This argument against vaccination is not sound as all the reasons given for saying no to vaccination are not supported by credible sources. Although, the author is consistent and clear he is arguing against vaccination his reasoning lacks any credible backing and his evidence cannot be validated. The argument seems to be entirely based on the author’s point of view and assumptions, which he does not bother to support with academic or research evidence. The truth of the reasons given by this author for saying no to vaccination cannot be validated. The only attempt the author makes of trying to validate his argument, is his purported origin from a medical family, but he does not say that he/she is a medical professional. The argument is therefore very weak as none of its six premises is valid and thus the whole argument is untrue. Despite this, the argument can be greatly enhanced by adding supporting evidence.

References

Sarah 2010, Six Reasons to say No to Vaccination, accessed on 20 May 2013, http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/six-reasons-to-say-no-to-vaccination/