Welfare payments and labor supply decisions


Submission date



Economic Theory offers an opening for the study in all fields of economics grounded on severe theoretical perceptive as well as on subjects in mathematics that are reinforced by the study of economic problems. Published articles subsidize to the understanding as well as a resolution of essential economic hitches. Economic theory descriptions in addition to accepting of the measure of things in a market place. Theoretical economic concepts in general have controlled support or lessons to show or contradict a specified theory (Atkinson & Stiglitz 2015). Mean-tested Welfare payments made by the governments, NGOs, among other well-wishers to low income households with the aim of relieving poverty in most countries, have greatly affected labor supply decisions both positively and negatively. Using the economic theory, this research seeks to clarify labor supply incentives sound effects of public welfare programs intended for low earnings families evaluating through empirical proof of the effects.

Welfare payments

Callan et al 2012 affirm that Welfare payments are given after a long process of test. Different countries and different well-wishers use different means to qualify low income households for the welfare payments aimed at relieving poverty. To meet the requirements for a public support payment one must content a means-test. A means test look at all sources of earnings. Conversely, some pay is not considered in the determination of your means. Tested welfare payments are given in form of water and sewerage, foods and clothes, transport and communication, scholarships and bursaries among others. The services are only given to the most deserving who are determined by the means test taken. The welfare payments are given for different reasons including; raise the living standards of the people, increase the health of the people, ease the burden of social services among others (Meyer 2002).

Mean-tested welfare payments programs are gradually getting well known in developing nations as an advantageous instrument for poverty mitigation. The programs main objective is to reduce current poverty by many people by boosting investments in nutrition, health as well as education. The triumph of the mean-tested welfare payments programs at decreasing existing poverty rest on whether, as well as the scope to which, transfer of cash affects adult exertion incentives. Once a household is carefully chosen as suitable, usually over environmental aiming or domestic level means-testing, the benefits are not affected by either labor resolutions of the domestic members or salary levels in the home (Moffitt 2002). This main effects the labor supply of adults could be a wholesome pay effect. In contrast to many welfare plans in US as well as Canada, have clear disincentives to labor.

Efficiency and equity

Johnson 2014 states that the concept of public economics studies government strategy above the look of economic competence in addition to equity. Public economics offers an outline rationally if or not the administration should contribute in money matters market and the degree to what part should be at a basic level. To effectively do so, microeconomic concept is applied to evaluate if the private free market can offer well-organized results if the government does not interfere. Fundamentally, the study includes the enquiry of administration levy as well as expenses. The topic covers many subjects comprising market failure, externalities as well as creation in addition to execution of government strategy. Public economics therefore, shapes the concept of welfare economics in addition is eventually used as an instrument to develop societal welfare (Moffitt 2002).

Labor supply decisions

Doiron, 2004 states that labor supply bring into being the hypothesis that labor force choose mish mash of hours-worked as well as pay in the direction of the aim of exploiting their degree of service given during the working hours of the day. Work is thought to be an unwelcome good in labor supply. Hours in a day not toiled is leisure hours. This is the wanted good. If labor supply is completely associated to the actual pay, then any rise in work demand will lead to greater balance amounts of work that is made accessible to work markets at advanced actual pays (Meyer 2002). Demand for work comes from makers looking for work effort as an aspect of effort into the manufacture procedure. Variations in work output, either from technological development or by addition of extra funds for every employee leads to an ascending swing in manufacture purpose as well as an external swing where every employee is more fruitful at the edge. Holding the actual income continuous results in extra work being take on and more yield being manufactured (Meyer & Rosenbaum 1999). Labor markets could be other forms of blows that may shake labor supply either from variations in labor power contribution rates or variations in settlement patterns. For instance, a easing of settlement procedures would swing labor supply away from tapping downward weight on the actual pay. This weakening in actual labor prices might bring business companies to employ more workers, raise the amount of manufacture as well as growing the productivity of the nation’s economy (Doiron, 2004).

Labor incentives

Labor incentives can attract an employee’s attention and motivate them to work. Labor incentives are aimed at improving the overall performance of an organization. Labor incentives are also flexible payments granted allowing to differences in the accomplishment of exact outcomes (Howell & Azizoglu 2011). As proposed by modern socialist’s modifications openly shake only a minor percentage of the advantageously working people. In addition, the result on this set would remain fewer than is every so often supposed. This is because the social democrat do not wish total economic equivalence, but as an alternative support the amount of discrimination essential to subdivision persons to bring to bear their Grade A efforts (Meyer 2002).

Market failure

Pickard 2015 describes Market failure in economics as a condition where distribution of goods as well as services isn’t effective. There is another possible result where a person can be complete comfortable without someone else getting uncomfortable. Market failures is regarded as situations in which individuals’ search of clean selfishness information to outcomes that are inefficient, those that are enhanced from a social view. Often, market failures is related to time-shift fondness, statistics irregularities, uncompeting markets, externalities, or community properties. The presence of market failure is every so often the cause that self-governing establishments, governments or supra-state organizations mediate in a specific market. Incomplete markets have led to market failure. Markets intended for certain goods are either incomplete or disappeared under faultless opposition. Nonexistence of markets for goods like public goods in addition to common property possessions is ground for market failure. It’s difficult to equate social as well as private benefits in addition to costs. This is because markets are either incomplete or absent. Indivisibilities is also a major cause of market failure. Pareto optimality is centered on a hypothesis of whole divisibility of goods in addition to influences used in consumption as well as production (Pickard 2015). Goods in addition to factors in reality are not enormously dividable as an alternative, they are undividable. Divisibility difficult arises from production of the goods and amenities used conjointly by many people. A road in a locality is a good example since it is used by many people in the area. The problem however, is the means to portion the expense of maintenances and repairs of the common way. In fact, only few people are concerned with the road’s repairs as well as maintenance (Ostrom 2012). Consequently, borderline social expenditures as well as borderline social assistances move away from one another and in addition Pareto optimality is not accomplished.

Mean-tested welfare payments have thus been of much needed help to the low income households. Labor supply decisions, labor incentives and market failure are factors that have directly affected the labor market thus directly affecting the low income households. To improve their lives in terms of education, health social services and the general comfort of the people, the mean-tested welfare payment have bridged the ever growing gap and those who qualify for the welfare payments are able to afford quality education, health care, water and sanitation and other social amenities at an affordable rate. This makes their lives comfortable and much easier. These payments however, could be used by the organizations or the government in other areas that the funds be directed to for the general growth of the nation or the society.


Mean-tested welfare expenditures made to low earning households are given with the main aim of relieving insufficiency in most countries. They are usually made by the government, NGOs, willing organizations among others to improve health, sanitation, education as well as general poverty reduction (Meyer 2002). The economic theory offers room to study the different areas of study in the mean-tested welfare payments. Through public economics, it’s possible to study the policies put in place to manage the welfare assistance, market failures as well as the trade-offs between equity and efficiency. Market failure is caused by incomplete markets, common property, imperfect markets as well externalities. Welfare payments have thus lead to improvement of the lives of the low income households. Through these payment, they can live a comfortable life, have access to good education and healthcare.


Callan, T., Keane, C., Savage, M. and Walsh, J.R., 2012. Distributional impact of tax, welfare and public sector pay policies: 2009-2012. Quarterly Economic Commentary, 2012(4), pp.46-56.

Doiron, D.J., 2004. Welfare reform and the labour supply of lone parents in Australia: A natural experiment approach. Economic Record, 80(249), pp.157-176.

Ehrenberg, R.G. and Smith, R.S., 2016. Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy. Routledge.

Howell, D.R. and Azizoglu, B.M., 2011. Unemployment benefits and work incentives: the US labour market in the Great Recession. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2), pp.221-240.

Johnson, N., 2014. Mixed Economies Welfare. Routledge.

Meyer, B.D. and Rosenbaum, D.T., 1999. Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers (No. w7363). National bureau of economic research.

Meyer, B.D., 2002. Labor supply at the extensive and intensive margins: The EITC, welfare, and hours worked. The American Economic Review, 92(2), pp.373-379.

Moffitt, R.A., 2002. Welfare programs and labor supply. Handbook of public economics, 4, pp.2393-2430.

Ostrom, E., Chang, C., Pennington, M. and Tarko, V., 2012. The Future of the Commons- Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation. Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs.

Pickard, V., 2015. Conclusion: Confronting Market Failure.