System Fundamentals Project Management Essay Example
3 Complex Systems: Corruption in Trade
COMPLEX SYSTEMS: CORRUPTION IN TRADE
Complex Systems: Corruption in Trade
Corruption as a Complex Phenomenon
Corruption in trade is widespread and has particularly increased in recent years due to ineffective methods of coping with corruption (Rose-Ackerman and Palifka, 2016). Mechanisms of carrying out corruption are more creative and involve higher levels of power along the economic chain. The vice has affected economic growth among countries and has infiltrated both political and social dimensions to a large extent. Efforts to reduce corruption have been implemented with various anti corruption strategies producing both positive and negative results. The phenomenon of corruption cannot be simply explained away as there are several factors, players and impacts that influence and get influenced by it. Precisely, corruption is a multifaceted phenomenon whose nature is particularly sophisticated (Ledeneva, 2013). This retro respect paper therefore discusses corruption in trade as a problem with a complex rationalization. The paper further discusses the challenges that need to be overcome so as to achieve an outcome that is successful in curbing corruption in trade as well as techniques that can be utilized in the management of the complex systems.
Corruption in trade has been repeatedly been recognized as complex in different studies by different scholars (Baldi et al, 2016). The term is certified as a construct that is difficult and one that is formed and developed in intricacy. The complexity of corruption in trade is additionally identified as the main barrier to implementing a framework that is systematic and intact (Baldi et al, 2016). The differences in anticorruption outcomes throughout several countries reveal that the model of anticorruption techniques and the final implementation are indeed convoluted (Coetzee, 2015). Corruption cuts across moral, legal, national and international barriers hence showing the absence of a definition that is precise and comprehensive in both theoretical and factual terms (Soreide, 2016). Matters that are related to corruption are always full of complexity. The individual decision to engage in corruption is a key factor in the obscure nature of the phenomenon. An additional factor that contributes to the complex nature of corruption is the relationship between the corruption and the efficacy of the legal system of a country. Complexity is therefore recognized as a factor that contributes to corruption in trade but is rarely evaluated in the study of corruption in trade (Coetzee, 2015). Scholars such as Rose-Ackerman (2016) suggest that the mere identification of corruption in trade as complex is not enough but rather the complex nature of the corruption in trade has to be looked into. The study of the complexity of corruption in trade is however a discipline that has increased the sophistication of the subject rather than suggest solutions to corruption in trade. The courses developed for actions against corruption in trade have therefore been more erudite as opposed to providing practical solutions for corruption in trade. This move has increased the complex nature of corruption therefore complicating a problem that is already extremely difficult.
Major Challenges that need to be overcome to achieve a Successful Outcome in Management of Corruption
Among the major challenges of corruption in trade to be overcome include the perception of corruption as a problem that can only be solved by the authorities (Philp and David-Barret, 2015). Most fights against corruption are targeted towards the management of an institution or the leadership of a respective region. Poor management leading to corruption is a simple problem that can be addressed by changing the system of management, enforcing policies and instituting corrective measures that restore the system to a state where corruption is absent. The phenomenon of corruption as a complex matter should therefore be understood and internalized among various parties to ensure that the appropriate strategies needed to curb corruption are put in place. The initial challenge to be addressed is thus assigning the real value of the complexity of corruption so that it can be tackled in its true nature.
Another major challenge is the normalcy that has grown into individuals regarding corruption in trade. Rooting out corruption in trade therefore becomes more complex as many individuals in the trade have accepted corruption as a way of life (Eicher, 2016). As explained in Plato’s allegory of the cave, the practice of corruption has become like a prison among individuals who practice it such that they know no other life (Jonas, 2017). The move to remove corruption among these individuals therefore poses a great challenge as the belief in the deed is so complex among the traders that it has affected the entire trading system. It has become usual to expect to bribe one’s way through the economic system or know an individual within an institution or with an influence over the economic system. This challenge requires more than a 006Csimple strategy to change practices that have become a habit within the trade system.
Aside from the complexity of the perception of individuals on the weakness in governance and the normalcy assigned to corruption in trade, another challenge is the different dimensions that are affected by corruption such as the legal system, the financial system and the social system (Eicher, 2016). The institution of approaches that covers the different bases which affect and are affected by corruption is difficult. The requirement of a set of rules to manage the set corruption problems is a recommended strategy which still requires massive harmonization of the different factors due to the complexity of corruption difficulties in trade. Furthermore, coming up with the strategies is a different task from implementing them and proving their practicability.
The complexity of corruption is a major challenge in itself. Complexity as a quality is not easily describable though there are several generators of complexity in corruption. McLeod and Pingle (2005) identify one generator of complexity as the large number of heterogeneous components affecting corruption. Marengo and Dosi (2005) on the other hand describe the interaction of these elements as complex while Michael (2004) purports that the adaptation of the elements to the changing environment increases the complexity of the phenomenon. This attempt to describe the complex nature of corruption shows the challenge presented in the bid to come up with a successful approach for a successful outcome.
Methodologies, Tools and techniques that might be used to assist in the management of Corruption in Trade
In a complex system, robust strategies can be adopted to manage the complex nature of the structure under study. Robust strategies are focused on scenarios where there is deep uncertainty such as a model that is extremely complex and where an agreement to a direct course of action is not simple. Robust strategies include tools and methods that support decisions and provide for an opportunity to assess alternate options (Hallegate and Rentscler, 2015). Robust strategies therefore represent approaches that are adaptive meaning the situation can be managed based on changes and availability of additional information that helps to manage the situation. There is a large focus placed on the future in the implementation of these strategies. The implementation of robust adaptive strategies therefore means that an institution or a state comes up with policies that can be used in the present and still be functional in the future. These strategies may involve giving more power to individuals in the economic systems to make decisions that affect the economic framework in a positive manner.
Risk management is an important approach in the management of complex systems as these systems have a high degree of uncertainty (Hallegate and Rentscler, 2015). The use of risk management as a strategy to manage corruption in trade involves the identification of the risks pertaining to the presence of corruption in the trade system. The major problem anticipated is the complete breakdown of the economic system. The major factors that could possibly contribute to the breakdown of the economic system need to be interconnected and grouped into sets where various sets of techniques are formulated to deal with the sets of problems. The anticipation of risk is a good move towards the management of corruption in trade but is still not as effective in the management of regular operations within the trade system.
Governance is significant as a strategy as it penetrates the different layers in the trade system and can easily be changed (Mele, 2005). The implementation of good governance comes with the setting up of principles such as transparency, accountability, fairness and responsibility. The presence of internal and external controls that foster accountability and other principles are helpful in the management of a complex system. The principles need to be implemented throughout all the ranks in the system for it to be effective. A compliance program is mandatory as well to help ensure the good governance is standard and continuous.
The above methods are different from the usual implementation of legal strategies. While still important, the legal system does not carry enough weight to eradicate the complexity of corruption as individuals have continuously found loopholes to continue with corrupt practices. Corruption is complex with different elements that form a unity. In order to curb it therefore, similar techniques should be used to help fight against the vice.
Baldi, S., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Piccardo, C., 2016. To bid or not to bid: That is the
question: Public procurement, project complexity and corruption. European Journal of
Political Economy, 43, pp.89-106.
Coetzee, J., 2015. The impact of corruption on development: a comparative developmental
perspective. Nawa: Journal of Language & Communication, 9(1).
Eicher, S. ed., 2016. Corruption in international business: The challenge of cultural and legal
diversity. CRC Press.
Hallegatte, S. and Rentschler, J., 2015. Risk management for development—Assessing obstacles
and prioritizing action. Risk Analysis, 35(2), pp.193-210.
Jonas, M.E., 2017. Plato on the Necessity of Imitation and Habituation for the Cultivation of the
Virtues. In Varieties of Virtue Ethics (pp. 233-248). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Ledeneva, A.V., 2013. A Critique ofthe Global Corruption “Paradigm”. Postcommunism from
Within: Social Justice, Mobilization, and Hegemony, p.297.
MacLeod, W. B. & M. Pingle: 2005, “Aspiration uncertainty: its impact on decision performance
and process”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 56(4): 617-629.
Marengo, L. & G. Dosi: 2005, “Division ofLabor, Organizational Coordination and Market
Mechanisms in Collective Problem-Solving”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and
Organization, 58(2): 303-326.
Melé, D.: 2005, ‘Ethical Education in Accounting: Integrating Rules, Values and Virtues’,
Journal of Business Ethics 57(1): 97-109.
Michael B.:2004, “What Do African Donor-sponsored Anti-corruption Programs Teach Us about
International Development in Africa?, Social Policy & Administration, 38 (4): 320–345.
Philp, M. and Dávid-Barrett, E., 2015. Realism about political corruption. Annual Review of
Political Science, 18, pp.387-402.
Rose-Ackerman, S. and Palifka, B.J., 2016. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences,
and reform. Cambridge university press.
Søreide, T., 2016. Corruption and Criminal Justice: Bridging Economic and Legal Perspectives.
Edward Elgar Publishing.
More Important Things