Swimming Australia Anti-Doping Policy Essay Example

  • Category:
  • Document type:
  • Level:
  • Page:
  • Words:

4Swimming Australia Anti-Doping Policy

Swimming Australia Anti-Doping Policy

Swimming Australia

Swimming Australia is the body that governs competitive swimming in Australia. It is has about one hundred thousand members who are registered across the country in about one thousand, one hundred clubs that comprise of coaches, swimmers, officials, volunteers and administrators. Swimming Australia is in charge of overseeing the development and management of the swimming sport from the national team, the conduct of international and national events via grassroots participation. The body has the vision of becoming of making swimming Australia’s leading sport by continual performance, increased participation, as well as commercial excellence. The development of swimming as a sport in Australia depends on the strategies and policies developed and implemented by Swimming Australia.

Anti-Doping Policy

Development and implementation
of policy

The anti-doping policy was implemented from 1st January, 2015. The anti-doping policy has to be read with references to Swimming Australia Limited. The policy was operationalized since January of 2015.

What the policy seeks to address?

The Anti-Doping policy is applicable to the sporting administration body as well as its members or other affiliate organizations. This policy targets to deter substance abuse among athletes and ensure fairness during competitions. The policy seeks to protect the integrity of sporting by the elimination of doping. The policy contains rules that govern the conditions under which sport is played (Magdalinski, 2009). The policy aims at enforcing anti-doing principles in a harmonized and globalized manner which is separate in their nature from civil and criminal laws. The purpose is to ensure equality in sporting like swimming in that athletes from Australia can participate on a playing field that is leveled both at home and overseas. Doping is contrary to the sportsmanship spirit. The anti-doping policy has to protect the integrity of sporting in Australia as well as the Australian Athletes’ health. The Sporting administration possesses its Code of Conduct (McNamee & Møller, 2011). This is separate policy document that is enforced and managed by the sporting administration body and it is applicable to all Athletes as well as their support personnel. Programmes relating to anti-doping aim at preserving the intrinsic value in sport. The intrinsic value is often known as ‘the spirit of sport’. The Anti-Doping Policy is very important in sporting and welfare of sports in Australia.

It is the personal duty of an athlete to make sure that any substance that is prohibited does not enter his or her body. Usually the athletes are held responsible for any substance that is prohibited or matabolites that are found present in samples from the athlete
(Magdalinski, 2009). Therefore, it is important to demonstrate fault, intent, or knowing use on the part of the athlete in order show the violation of an anti-doping rule. Substantial proof of violation of an anti-doping rule has to be demonstrated before disciplinary action is taken. The violation of the anti-doping rule is normally committed under Article 2.1.1 of the Anti-Doping policy without reference to the fault of the Athlete. The Anti-Doping policy the actions that will be taken to cur doping and ensure a leveled playing field in sporting. Athletes are discouraged from injecting substances that will make them to have undue advantage over others during competitions. The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) advises all sporting bodies to advise athletes to avoid supplements with prohibited substances. About half of all athletes who were banned from sport in the year 2013 tested positive for stimulants that are found in supplement products (Mazanov, 2013). Such concerns raise the seriousness of anti-doping regulations in every sport to avoid embarrassing incidents to the country. Anti-doping policy requires cooperation from all stakeholders in the sporting fraternity to deal with cases of athletes using prohibited substances that jeopardizes their careers.


Mazanov, J. (2013). Towards a Social Science of Drugs in Sport, Sydney: Routledge.

Magdalinski T. (2009). Sport, Technology and the Body: The Nature of Performance, Melbourne: Routledge.

McNamee, M. & Møller, V. (2011). Doping and Anti-Doping Policy in Sport: Ethical, Legal and Social Perspectives, Melbourne: Routledge.

Save Your Time for
More Important Things
Let us write or edit the article on your topic