Rhetorical Analysis (Conduct academic research) Essay Example

  • Category:
    Literature
  • Document type:
    Essay
  • Level:
    Undergraduate
  • Page:
    2
  • Words:
    829

Equality Not Yet Here

Introduction

Celebrities influence the way people think and view the world. This is certainly the case when the show “Confessions of a Female Chauvinist Sow” by Anne Roiphe was first published on the magazine entitled, New York in 1972. It was through this masterpiece that Roiphe tried to motivate women about equality and the use of the expression such as, “»Women who want equality must be prepared to give it and believe in it . . . .» stands out to be an inspiration to many over 50 years since. In as much, the message as the one cited above is the centre of attraction but the contrast, personal anecdotes, and comparison she skillfully uses to bring a convincing and strong essay. This is the departure for this rhetorical analysis.

To conceptualise this point, Roiphe starts her story giving personal anecdote by showing readers how horrified she is when she came to realize that her husband was just like her father who did not dare give equality to women. This expression makes readers realize the author as personal and informal. Conversely, these lines help in capturing the attention of readers. Also related to this case is when the Roiphe makes her audiences notice that the mother used to give her “mad money” before going for dates. She adds, “My mother and I realized that men were apt to drink very much and what I took as mad money was to ensure I get home safely.” These kinds of anecdotes get readers entertained and tend to lighten the mood of the essay. Another purpose of the anecdotes in this case is to substantiate and give support to the main ideas. Roiphe says, “The hidden anti-male feelings, a result of the old system, will foul us up if they are allowed to persist.» This is immediately followed by the idea that men have not let women to be equal and their freedom is still “oppressed” by men in what she terms as “inconsiderate and untrustworthy” men.

Shortly after these anecdotes that capture attention, Roiphe resorts to what contrast her arguments. This has been used successfully to give men impression as being morally rotten and on the same breath, boys are seen as incapable and less moral. This is contrasted with women who she says, “everyone is having assumptions that mothers will never let their children starve.” These contrasts have been used as a connotation that shows men as unlovable and in so speaking; women are still striving for the equality that are still denied by men. This as she puts it, shows a barrier to equality between women and men. Conversely, these contrasts support what she says later regarding similarities between women and men. The strongest point that the author makes is when she says, “The hidden anti-male feelings, a result of the old system, will foul us up if they are allowed to persist.» This is to mean women must stand up and take their position as their equality will not come knocking unless they become aggressive about it.

Midway through her narration, Roiphe makes a transition from contrast to comparison. This is where she makes audience believe that whatever a man can do women can do it even better. She states in support, “Intellectually I know that’s ridiculous . . .» to assume «. . . that women given power would not create wars.» Assertions such as this makes Roiphe authoritatively conceptualises the distance that exist as far as equality is concerned. She adds, «. . . us laughing at them, us feeling superior to them, us ridiculing them behind their backs . . .» is «. . . inescapably female chauvinist sowness.» This makes readers believe that men are wholly to blame for the misfortunes that women have been going through. In as much as this is the point, Roiphe walks readers through statements such as, “…what have we done to save ourselves from such menace?” This is a show that women are partly to blame for what they have been going through as far as inequality is concerned.

Conclusion

The author has augmented her feelings to audience. More capturing is that she uses more than the anecdotes, contrast and comparison. For instance, had she bluntly asserted earlier that women are “female chauvinist sows,» and fails to show contrasts then audience would have got different experience. As a matter of fact, women would have been offended. This is a case where the author excellently plans on how to use her technique and integrates then in a manner that they offer solutions to where assertions may be quoted out of context thus making offensive remarks. As a matter of fact, this has allowed her to tactfully create an essay that is beneficial in helping her present the ideas she would like to.

Work Cited

Roiphe, Anne. «Confessions of a Female Chauvinist Sow.» Patterns of Exposition 9. Ed. Randall E. Decker. Boston: Little, Brown, 1982. 85-90.