• Category:
  • Document type:
  • Level:
  • Page:
  • Words:

3Qualitative Data Collection Report


Qualitative research as a method of inquiry provided me with an opportunity to get crucial information, on the views that different students harbor as far as work-integrated learning, internationalization in the classroom, classroom environment at the university are concerned. Getting the correspondents to cooperate in a qualitative research is an issue that proved to be more challenging than I had earlier on thought. In my planning for the interviews, I did not take into account the duration that I would take to convince the correspondents that I was doing something that was worth the time that they had to give to me. In the future, I will careful develop an interview schedule that will outline the time frame that each event will take during the qualitative analysis. This will guide me to avoid spending much time on correspondents who are not ready to cooperate since the process is supposed to be voluntary for it to be a success.

Whereas structured interviews were the main source of information during the qualitative research, the method is prone to inaccurate reporting. To better the accuracy of the information gathered from the correspondents, I will not incorporate focused group discussions as a data collection method. This will enhance wider deliberations on the questions that I will pose to them. This will imply that I simply take the strong points that emerge from the discussions and hence improve the accuracy of the information that goes to the analysis stage. Although the group, discussions might be seen to be more time consuming when compared to structured interviews, the information resulting from the discussion is more superior and the time itself is compensated for at the data analysis stage where one works only on the few results derived from the discussions.

Qualitative research yields broader knowledge about a given subject (Denzin and Lincoln, 2000). The questions used during a qualitative research interview session are usually structured in different ways; some are usually open ended questions while others are closed ended. The open ended questions especially, give the correspondents an opportunity to illustrate their stand points on the issues at hand. It is always important to acknowledge a variety of opinions as they relate to a given issue. Through qualitative research, one is able to gather the different opinions and at the end of the day come up with a sound statement on the issue at hand. It presents the interviewer with an opportunity to interact with correspondents and in fact, form a very strong discussion group without the knowledge of the participants. This makes it so easy for the correspondents to reveal confidential information which greatly add value to the intent of the study.

For analysis of the results of the qualitative research, I will employ a method known as content analysis. In this method, data analysis will be carried out in systematic steps. First and foremost, the results will be analyzed for biasness. This is from the understanding that some of the correspondents might have given information that is very much biased and such information have to be eliminated in order to come up with a viable report on the study. Secondly, I will focus the analysis, that is, considering the responses to each question as handled by each correspondent. This will enable me to establish consistencies and differences in the responses provided. The third step will be coding the data. This way, I will be able to identify themes or patterns, that is, the concepts, ideas, behaviors, interactions, incidents, terminology or phrases as used by the correspondent. I will then be able to organize them into coherent categories that summarize and bring meaning to the text. The fourth stage in this process will be identifying patterns and connections within and between the coded categories. The patterns and connections will hence be critical in giving the theme of the study.


Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage

Publication Inc.