Property Development Process Planning Assignment Essay Example

  • Category:
    Architecture
  • Document type:
    Assignment
  • Level:
    Masters
  • Page:
    2
  • Words:
    971

5Insert Surname

Property Development Process Planning

Introduction

Since time immemorial, planning has been a significant player in development. This is because of the fact that, through adequate planning, development takes chronological steps that ensure achievable goals are in place. It is worth noting that with property, the dynamics are different as the projects are expensive, and consume significant amounts of time in both implementation and maintenance. This is implies that there is a dire need to negate any consequential losses that might emanate from developmental losses (Eves, 174). In light of these sentiments, property development planning is process that has emanated in the recent past meant to better projects or initiatives warranting successful performance.

Barangaroo is a name given to the harbor on the western edge of Sydney. Barangaroo is on the verge of redesign and re-developed aimed at facilitating the combination of business and hotels in the parkland use. The intention is to develop the area into three-section region that can accommodate. It is prudent to note that, Barangaroo was created to enhance Sydney’s waterfront. As well as encourage outdoor recreational activity like cycling and walking.

Property Development Process

February 2007 was the date that the first Barangaroo Concept Plan for was approved by the NSW Minister. The plan covers both urban design and policy initiatives. It is apparent that a concept plan is a significant prerequisite emanating from constitutional enactments. In light of these sentiments, the Barangaroo concept plan is the statutory planning instrument intended to guide the redevelopment initiative. Sydney’s globalization endeavors have taken the centre stage in redevelopment initiative. For instance, in February 2009, the Government awarded 120,000 square metres of floor space at Barangaroo seeking to reaffirm that Sydney is the global headquarters in the region. Additionally, months later, further amendments seeking to refine the planning meant for Northern Cove and the Headland Park were indoctrinated (Guy, 270). Subsequently, amendments have been made under the watch of the government awarding additional floor space; were necessary. For instance, towards the end of 2010, the concept plan was amended to allow a landmark hotel, additional height, and additional floor space. The Minister for Planning amended the three adjustments in the following year (Guy, 270). It is evident that since incorporation, the concept plan has undergone four adjustments.

As is the case in any development initiative, the surrounding community has marred the affair with uproars. For instance, one city hotel owner complained that the trucks travelling to the barangaroo site were cogging the key city roads in the busy area. The resident went ahead to take legal action, in his argument the hotel owner wanted the roads authority to explain how it was possible to have such a massive construction going on without the company trucks not impacting on the key roads in central Sydney (Hunt, 65). The land leases were to respond to the planning department, the company spokesperson responded arguing that measures were being put in place to minimize any inconveniences caused by the company while the construction was ongoing. To avert this array of issues, it is prudent for the Barangaroo planners to incorporate communal ideas and negate any infringement whatsoever.

Another inalienable issue that that requires urgent redress revolves around asbestos contamination in the soil. According to ample human health and ecological risk assessment, only 1% of the material is allowed in the headland park. It is worth noting that this percentage comes with a range of conditions. For example, the material should be buried under 0.5 meters under the soil surface. It goes without say that; there is a high possibility of such highly contaminated material arousing discomfort among the stakeholders (Healey, Michael, and Frank, 144). These results to interference by independent review experts in the field of health commissioned to harness environmental protection authority by assessing the situation. The experts were to unearth the long-term consequences emanating from exposure to asbestos.

Reflection

It is notable that the primary goal in any construction endeavor is to minimize losses and maximize on returns. Evidently, the Barangaroo construction was meant to maximize on positive returns while minimizing on health risks. The first recommendation denotes that in any democratic society, public idea sharing is imperative. According to the environmental planning and assessment Act, the public should be involved in planning decisions by availing an opportunity where they voice their concerns. The engagement of public participation assists the bureaucracy in making informed decisions. The developer did not plan for transport arrangements adequately (Potoczky and Kurkok, 60). This is because of the fact that, the current Barangaroo transport infrastructure can barely hold the entire populace.

With the expected population influx by over 20,000 workers, the transport system will defiantly cave in. additionally, increase in the central business district will increase job opportunities hence increasing commuters. The development of Barangaroo needs to incorporate a transport system, ample parking space, as the additional car traffic will eventually overcrowd the central business district. Such a scene is unacceptable as it creates a bazaar outcome paving way to immense confusion. The planning development process of Barangaroo is hence an endearing task that requires urgent redress to avert the looming losses.

Works Cited

Eves, Chris. «Planned Residential Community Developments: Do They Add Value?.» Property Management 25.2 (2007): 164-179. Print.

Guy, Clifford. «Planning For Retail Development.» Journal of Retail and Leisure Property 6.3 (2007): 269-270. Print.

Healey, Patsy, Michael Purdue, and Frank Ennis. «Negotiating Development: Planning Gain And Mitigating Impacts.» Journal of Property Research 13.2 (2006): 143-160. Print.

Hunt, Robert. «Golf Development And The Planning Process In The UK” Is It Worth The Gamble?.» Journal of Retail & Leisure Property 2.1 (2005): 52-65. Print.

Potoczky, K., and J. Kurko. «Working With The Property Development Sector—Integrating Active Living Principles Into The Planning And Design Process.» Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 12 (2010): 59-60. Print.