Beautiful flowers of the Maquiladora Essay Example

Your post demonstrates unethical dilemma. According to Fernando (2009), unethical dilemma is a moral situation in which a decision has to be made between equally undesirable alternatives. In an ideal world, corporations and their workers are required to do the right thing. Unfortunately, in your case, what the federal government did was not right. The fact that the government wanted to take control of traditional land would mean that the local communities would be exploited. I concur with you that advising the local communities that the changes would be for the greater good while in real sense they would be exploitative is moral dilemma issue. I commend you for talking a bold step of quitting your job because what the government required of you conflicted with your moral values.

However, you could have taken some measures to save the community from the exploitation. You indicated that it was unfair to roll out intervention measures that did little or nothing to address the real issues. More so, you stated that closing the gap between the indigenous and non-indigenous Australian failed ten years later and a lot of money was wasted. I do not blame you, because sometimes the regular focus on what is wrong or right instigates stagnation of our thinking that we forgot to take right measures. In my opinion, you could have acted in good faith and present your views to the concerned people, a step that would have perhaps led to invention of local strategies that would have benefited the local communities. According to Bowie and Schneider (2011), people can eradicate the danger of unethical conduct by taking precautionary measures. The quality of been accountable and open by disclosing pertinent information and issues goes a long way toward lowering the danger and effects unethical behaviour.

References

Bowie, N., & Schnieder, M.(2011). Business ethics for dummies. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Fernando, A.(2009). Business ethics: An Indian perspective. India. Pearson Education

I concur with you that the perspectives of wrong and rights changes with outside influences. According to Eweje (2009), when firms are facing conditions where the fear of rejection and extinction dominates, the moral conditions are often overruled by the prospect of material gain. Firms adhere to the moral minimum instead of proactively getting involved in moral principles. The unwillingness of the business owner to confront the situation and warn the two senior staff was because of the fear of losing them. Notably, the business owner thought that confronting the senior employees would jeopardise the business. This is because the two were resourceful and instrumental to the survival and productivity of the business. I do not blame for laying the blame to the business owner and taking a break. The business owner had the power and authority to end the unfairness and cultivate a culture of fairness and justice in the workplace. He lacked a sense of ethics. According to Dwivedi (2011), when ethics prevail, a sense of justice and fairness exists. The failure to address how people work creates a void in the moral makeup of the human resource management. The business owner should have pursued moral issues of fairness and justice with more than the goal to add instrumental value only to the business, but also to ensure a less stressful work environment.

References

Dwivedi, R.S.(2009). A textbook of human resource management, 1E. USA: Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.

Eweje, G.(2014). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: Emerging trends in developing economies. USA: Emerald Group Publishing.

Firstly, am sorry for what you went through. Secondly, I support your capitalist views that a business would hire or retain a non-pregnant woman instead of a pregnant woman for the sake of business sustainability and productivity. According to Prieto (2010), businesses are interested in two basic things that include quality and productivity. A pregnant woman in a capitalist world would not produce the same level as a non-pregnant woman. More so, pregnancy entails extra costs because the firm would be required to compensate the woman for maternity leave. However, it is unfair to discriminate against pregnant women in the workplace. Discrimination takes place when an employee is treated less favourably than others. Contrary to your opinion, I believe what you went through was an issue of ethics and that it was unethical for the manager to seek for your replacement based on your condition. According to Trevino and Nelson (2010), ethics is an extension of good management. Leaders identify inappropriate and appropriate and communicate their expectations to employees through codes of ethics. I concur with your assertion that legislation is needed to direct the conduct of employers and organisational managers. With the increasing number of women in the workforce, pregnancy accommodation rules are important.

References

Prieto, N.(2010). Beautiful flowers of the Maquiladora: Life histories of women workers in Tijuana. USA: University of Texas Press.

Trevino, L, & Nelson, K.(2010). Managing business ethics. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

I support your opinion that business can be held morally accountable. With respect to the Fusion Electric case study, it is evident that business can be held morally responsible given the actions of management who are the agents or actors of the business. According to De George (2008), corporations are held morally responsible for their actions. Although objects can be casually responsible for given upshots, they cannot in entirety be morally responsible because they are not moral actors. Assigning of moral responsibility requires that the agent or actor perform the action knowingly and the agent or actor perform willingly. Given that corporations act through people who run them and work for them, it is true that businesses can be held morally responsible. According to Roberts and Mann (2009), because corporations are artificial entities and not persons, it is difficult to determine if they should be held morally responsible. However, because individuals within corporations can be held morally accountable, the corporate can be held morally responsible. The attributes of accountability inherent in corporations are adequate to give good reason for judging corporate conduct from a ethical perspective.

References

De George, R.(2008). The ethics of information technology and business. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Mann, R., & Roberts, B.(2010). Business law and the regulation of business. UK: Cengage Learning.