Professor Essay Example

  • Category:
    Management
  • Document type:
    Assignment
  • Level:
    Undergraduate
  • Page:
    2
  • Words:
    940

Individual Reflection on Group Processes

Introduction

Notwithstanding that learning is a personal matter, modern perspectives to learning put forward that other people facilitate learning. With respect to constructivists, learning should entail provision of support for students as they develop and alter their mental models. Support from group of students with a shared learning objective offers an efficient learning procedure and good learning results. This has been the case with our group where we were able to accomplish our assignment within the stipulated time and attained better results. Through group collaboration, we were able to share our resources, ideas and experiences. Debate, discussion and understanding one another ‘s different opinions besides obtaining explanations of ideas and concepts from group members facilitated quick completion of our group assignment.

Our group was not hereditary, but it developed through the five stages of Tuckman’s group development which include forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (Cragan & Kasch, 2008). Given that our group involved people with the same mind-set and shared a common goal, our group did not experience any issue relating to conflict. We portioned our assignment equally where each member did his own part upon which we combined our effort to compile the assignment. We set apparent roles and responsibilities for each member to avert conflict. I personally did two parts of the assignment and my part involved identifying key roles and responsibilities of the operation manager and developmental plan. We were able to confront task obstacles with entail intricacies in planning and approving the group roles, and interpersonal obstacles which entail intricacies in making concepts clear to the group members.

My part was not taxing as I was only required to ascertain major roles of operations managers. This entailed having a clear understanding of operation management in a firm and how human resource management facilities management of operations in the firm. I consulted a wide body of literature and conducted a thorough research on the company’s operations to understand what the role of operations manager entails. During the research, I did not encounter any difficulty because information was easily accessible from the company and available literature. As regards the development plan, a lot of time and energy was used while coming up with the best development plan for the company. I conducted some research in order to ascertain how human resource management can develop strategies for setting employees objectives, evaluate performance and employees’ personal capacity.

With respect to the general functional theory of communication, we identified and assessed our group assignment, collected and evaluated data concerning managing human resources at Coles, generated alternative proposals besides discussing the assignment objectives (Cragan & Kasch, 2008). We finally assessed the alternatives and objectives to reach to an agreement on how to approach the assignment. We stuck to our original agreement discussed in Week 3 on how to approach the group work. We collaborated through exchanging information, raising questions and responding to group member’s comments. Through collaboration we motivated ourselves on being more accountable on our learning procedure. Each group member took his/her role seriously and we had no problem in accomplishing our assignment. The fact that we respected the group diversity based on each other’s social identity helped in preventing any form of conflict in the group (Cragan & Kasch, 2008). Lack of conflict in the group facilitated quick sharing of roles, collection of ideas and information, assessment of ideas and compiling of the assignment.

However, making critical decisions regarding the assignment was somehow taxing. This is because decision making entails assimilating a bigger amount of data, explore diverse concepts and drawing on many experience strands. Through understanding that the upshots of a wrong or right decision could be insightful for the group, we limited how much information each person could process besides restraining the number of perspectives each group member could see (Cragan & Kasch, 2008). To make most of the group’s decisions we encouraged participation of each group member to survey the assignment, offer input and make the ultimate choice. While making decisions in the group, we were also very keen on our accessible resources and time, temperament of the assignment and the atmosphere the group members wanted to form.

I believe that our group accomplished its task so well because of the productive collaboration, adequate preparation, time and resources and avoidance of conflict at all cost. Although our decision making took a little longer, I believe that this happened because of our group diversity and the fact that each person has a different way of understanding the world around us, and different options regarding the assignment. However, understanding that we can never be similar in terms of ideas and opinions, some group members withdrew their ideas to back those that were more important and applicable in the group assignment.

Conclusion

Group work is essential as it facilitates learning, participation and collaboration among group members. There are several aspects that can hinder effective group work such as slowed decision making, conflicts and lack of participation by some group members. Our group did not encounter any form of conflict, but we had a problem in making quick decisions. Although making decision in a group calls for time, patience and understanding, and that team decision making can be complex, I think that in order to hasten our decision making process in future group work, we can began by defining the decision to be made and pertinent information, determine option and set a target besides keeping all the group members focused without sidetracking important group agenda and issues.

Reference

Cragan, J., & Kasch, C. (2008). Communication in small groups: theory, process, and skills. London: Cengage Learning.