Management ethic Essay Example
Re- assessing Business Ethics in Garment Factories: a case study for the Bangladesh’s Dhaka factory
Re- assessing Business Ethics in Garment Factories: a case study for the Bangladesh’s Dhaka factory.
Accusations by De George against multinationals
Dhaka’s case is not the only one. Other multinationals are engaging in a widespread unethical conduct in the LDC’s. The issues that this article raises are many. Most are especially as discussed by De George concerning the behavior of multinationals in the LDC’s. Poor structures, cheap labour, lack of legal protection of the workers, poor pay, and denial of basic rights are the De George’s accusations against multinationals.
De George’s guidelines on remedies
De George proposes of four principles to guide in business ethics. He says there is the responsibility of corporations .these responsibilities should relate with other responsibilities. It is the responsibility of Dhaka Company to make profits. The profits will go along to paying for the workers and to guaranteeing its continuity. The company is making a lot of profits even when providing relatively cheap clothing to consumers. This is good. Company owners and consumers would find little to complain about. The bulk of servitude and suffering lies squarely with the over 3000 workers of the company. When 3000 women cannot break even no matter whether they overwork themselves is very inhumane. Treating humans as means to an end is unethical. The question is: can this factory be held morally responsible?
De George advises the need for any corporation held accountable for its own actions. When a corporate breaches the code of moral conduct, it should be blamed for the consequences. It should be responsible. The alarm raised by the inspectors ought to have been respected by the owners of the factory. The collapse of the eight floor factory would have still occurred just accidents do, but the lives of the poor and rural women would have been protected. The evacuation order to the factory owners meant a reduction in the returns. The factory implies that lives of its workers were not as precious and important compared to the daily cash inflow the many hands were helping to realize. How could it simply allow workers to evacuate? It should have allowed them not to report to work on that day if it really cared about the safety of the workers. The case for this factory becomes even complex when genuine complains by the workers are criminalized. They cannot engage in an industrial unrest. Go on strike and you are fired. Workers cannot give each other moral and psychosocial support in trade unions. Most of factories like this one in Dhaka prefer women as the employees. Women rarely engage in trade unions that fight for the rights of fellow workers. These rights include better pay, good working conditions among others. When corporations refuse to be held accountable for the consequences of their own willed actions, what should be the rescue?
The question of legal responsibility arises. Are there any written regulations that govern any corporation? The Dhaka case is very crucial in this. Although human life cannot retail at any price worth it, Dhaka factory should explain the extent to which is ready and willing to compensate the victims. But if the constitution of Bangladesh does not protect her citizens from scrupulous corporations like this, then the whole issue becomes extremely difficult. There is need to know the channels of filling a complaint against the company. A guarantee that justice would be expeditiously met is very fundamental. If the existing structure does not support legal responsibility, what happened in Dhaka will still repeat itself there or elsewhere. As far as business ethics is concerned this should not be the trend. However, perhaps the first world corporations should be brought on board too.
When 1st world corporations set up sub standard buildings and structures in the 3rd word countries, they should also be held accountable for such selfish acts. There is no good reason enough for collapsing buildings to mushroom all over Bangladesh, Cambodia, and the US- Mexican border. The motive behind such acts is because these are fertile grounds for cheap labour whose supply is abundant. The 1st world corporations are also quite aware of how simple and cheap it is to avoid safety regulations and overlook the required environmental standards in the 3rd worlds. They should be ethical as well. The rights of a multinationals are not superior to those of LDC’s. Justice should be to all.
Values in Business Ethics
In life just as in any business, moral as well as ethical dilemmas are very common. In a society that condemns people and praises, others on the basis of their own actions, then the question of values are inevitable. It matters not whether we are deontologists or utilitarian.
Quality, responsibility, respect, teamwork, integrity, and honesty are some of the values that any individual should aim at. They should be practiced by any individual or a group of individuals that sets out for a common good ethical end. These values are at my heart since I would practice them in my business.
Quality and responsibility are the two values that would impact my business most. Following Kant’s maxims of acting in such a way as to treat humanity not as means to an end but as an end in them, integrity is a value I would cultivate. Why would I charge customers differently for the same good or service to different customers? Sale of expired goods would not be compatible with me. Those who do this only enrich themselves at the expense of other’s comfort, rights, and happiness. I would not be one found not promoting the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. What I would never attempt is to offer sub standard services, in order to charge less. I would concentrate in making better my products and services even if it would mean more prices on the side of the customers. What I am saying in simple terms is that customers would be made to appreciate the value their money.
Responsibility is another value that I would cultivate in the mentioned business. People would want to be associated with good results. When the results are undesirable, people tend to distance themselves from them. If the business registers a loss in the process having done what I am required to do, I would proudly own the consequences. Is this not what Kantian deontology recommends? This is what is called responsibility. Integrity goes a long way to address the idea of giving due change even to the illiterates. This is would be done indiscriminatively regardless the age, nationality or gender of the customer in question.
Wanting to make profits is not a crime per say. However, when most of these are acquired through very compromising means the basic dictates of humanity as well as a good business, there are those business people that neglect those parts that are not open to the customers. They will engage in very fraudulent behaviors.
Mistakes happen even in business. A customer may come complaining of a certain sub standard product that I am selling. Knowing that I am the one who sold it I would put in a moral dilemma. Admitting the mistake would go along to tarnish my business. Denying it I would be saying that I don’t care. Honesty as a value is what I would exploit and be ready for any reactions thereafter.
More Important Things