Location of Institution

  • Category:
  • Document type:
  • Level:
  • Page:
  • Words:

Communicating Across Cultures 2

Communication across Cultures

Location of Institution


The capability to coordinate and communicate across cultures has been available since time started and has turned out to be notable since worldwide business extended past social limits. From an example about the American and Germans cooperating to convey an undertaking, the exhibit of issues between the two societies was highlighted. Without finding out about each other’s way of life, issues can be misinterpreted between the various cultures. For instance, the predisposition toward making a move, straightforward observations, making the wrong presumptions and physical appearances that give possibly temperamental answers in a blended society. With the best possible training and concentrating on of different societies, the contrasts between our societies can be decreased between nations. Communication between two different cultures is more than just being able to understand each other’s language. Communication between cultures is truly about being able to take the beliefs, values, phobias and anxieties away from within the organization or organizations which are trying to communicate with each other for the same common goals.


Globalization is a term which has turned out to be increasingly a common term that numerous associations are utilizing today as a part of the contextual analysis. Perceiving how two distinct associations from two unique nations can construct a vital union keeping in mind the end goal to have their item distributed in two unique markets in business, for instance, is what globalization is about. «This vital alliance is something that can be instrumental for an association. The Germans were in charge of the release of the laser for eye surgery in Europe and the Americans were responsible for North America» (Hitt 2011).

On account of this sort of endeavor between the two associations, every side would put one of their agents with the other group amid the starting of the new item in their separate nations to have the capacity to gain from each different and also loan any specialized aptitude to each other in the process. For the Germans and Americans, the Germans worked in an alternate configuration than what Americans were used to when it came to building up an arrangement with a specific end goal to dispatch the item and make it an effective dispatch. The Germans were «fixated on their emphasis on the issue, while we Americans concentrate more on the arrangements» (Hitt 2011).

The same issue was seen with the German partners when it came to perceiving how their American partners functioned in the U.S. when it came time for the Americans to dispatch the item in their nation. The Germans perceived how their considerations about how Americans work together were not how they lead the business. «The Germans believed that Americans were easygoing by the way they direct business, yet they soon discovered that the American partners were considerably more progressive system situated» compared with what Germans were used to (Hitt 2011).

A portion of the issues that were seen in the contextual investigation come from not completely understanding the social contrasts between the two. If both the Americans and the Germans could take away the generalizations that may have been painted for them as they grew up then they would see that the Germans and the Americans were truly the same in a wide range of ways. «A portion of the resemblance is that societies that are thought to be low-connection societies, for example, both Germany and the U.S. anticipate that messages will be express and particular» (Goman, 2011).

Because of the social contrasts between the two, it is vital for the authority on both sides to guarantee that they have done whatever they can do keeping in mind the end goal to help with the general fruitful combination of the two societies. «One proposed methodology is to teach every working worker about the accomplice’s qualities and shortcomings and clarify to them how gaining specific aptitudes will reinforce their organization’s aggressive position» (Hill 2008). For this to happen and be effective, everyone in the leadership has to become involved on both sides to ensure that they are giving their respective colleagues the correct information to make this strategic alliance work and be successful.

Accomplices from Germany and America, in an equivalent joint endeavor, worked couple to convey another laser into the European and North America commercial center. In our example according to Hitt, as the Germany group got ready to discharge the laser an American named Jim, worked with the group in Stuttgart to put the completing touches on the item before its discharge into the commercial center. Jim had social difficulties in the organization stage as the Germany group examined eve the smallest detail for the item without building up a technique rapidly. After the third day, the group concocted particular points of interest for every part to create all alone. Because of Jim’s predisposition on the best way to achieve the mission, he lost persistence after the second day of discourses and missed the particular necessities that were laid out on the third day. Jim’s decisional powers lead him to need allotted assignments and get all colleagues off to work their particular subtle element for the task towards the start. He needed to share data between colleagues while the other Germany colleagues were working their point by point arrangements. Fundamentally, the German group worked out the particular points of interest toward the starting in the dialog and Jim attempted to stay adaptable and right the deficiencies in the trails after the procedure was produced yet it didn’t happen that way. «The German group trusted the vital arrangement was constructed right on time amid the discourses and every colleague was discharged to calibrate their part of the task however Jim experienced difficulty since he didn’t see the same idea amid the three-day system session. Jim put together his part of the venture, and the German group discharged the laser to the commercial center as booked» (Hitt 2011).

When it was the Americans, swing to discharge the laser toward the North American commercial center, a German by the name of Klaus set out to Philadelphia to help the American group in the last arrival of the laser. Klaus could give assistance however the American group went about the procedure by allotting assignments as opposed to working out the system first. All subtle elements were controlled by the pioneer, and every colleague took their outcomes back to the gathering and advised the discoveries to advance independence rather than group proprietorship. Klaus worked with no cooperation on the work day and not exceptionally adaptable in regards to regular adjustments to get the project finished. «Self-overseeing was a German procedure that Klaus was alright with, and he was extremely capable and willing to deliver his work without loads of collaboration. Toward the end of the mission, Klaus, and the American had gotten the laser into the commercial center effectively» (Hitt 2011).

«Essentially, every group was fruitful with their particular guest however they found a few social contrasts like treatment of females, pompous people, being headed to work verses easygoing work discussion, how to talk with the local dialect as first names and neither group took an ideal opportunity to become acquainted with their guest» (Penn, 2014). «On the off chance that the groups had taken some assorted social qualities preparing before their guests arrived, some of these distinctions could have been kept away» (Schmidt, 2014). Also, the distinctions in choice force and individual independence could have been depicted so every guest could understand exactly how their joint accomplice would approach the task. The German group shared data toward the starting, and the American group shared as every part was building up their part of the undertaking subtle elements. In the long run, the American group set decisional power with the pioneer while the German pioneer acted more as an individual from the group rather than the supervisor. «Every kind of society works for their individual country, yet an outcast does not fit in extremely well unless they are given the social training to integrate into the inverse group» (Schmidt, 2014). Social contrasts don’t need to be a depreciator from the achievements of the venture; legitimate preparing and arranging can beat the difficulties they display.


In the example that was given, it appears as though the two distinct associations felt that they knew enough about each other’s social contrasts keeping in mind the end goal to meet up and dispatch another item in each separate business sector. It is seen that it is critical that every side gets their work done in transit they work and go to some center ground on their administration styles with a specific end goal to circuit two socially distinctive organizations into one complete association where every side is not second speculating the others work. This shows the magnitude and importance of understanding the Dos and Don’ts in different social cultures with communication being the major one among them all.


Goman, C. K. (2011, March). Communicating Across Cultures — ASME. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from https://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/business-communication/communicating-across-cultures

Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2008). Strategy in the global environment. In Strategic Management (10th ed., pp. 263-305). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2011). Organizational behavior in a Global Context. In Organizational Behavior (3rd ed., pp. 83-127). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Penn, S. (2014). Cultural Communication Barriers in the Workplace. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/cultural-communication-barriers-workplace-13888.html

Schmidt, D. (2014). What is Culture Shock and Tips for Dealing with It. Retrieved from http://moving.about.com/od/internationalmoves/a/culture_shock.htm