Invasion of the public sphere: how informed are we? Essay Example

  • Category:
    Other
  • Document type:
    Article
  • Level:
    Undergraduate
  • Page:
    2
  • Words:
    1144

Student

’s NameProfessor

’s NameCourse
Date
Introduction
Inversion of publicspace
Introduction At
this
age, most of the
consumers are politically disengaged
who are more concerned about what
they
buy
and not who
they are as individuals. In the
modern
society, the
previous
anecdote is used as an example of a microcosm. After that has been said, it has been seen that public has always
been
manipulated in the
modern
day. Public sphere creates a space that
the public is meant to meet
and
discuss
issues that without any
form of restrictions. It is critical to comprehend that such political issues can finally
become
political
course of action. The
public
spare is a platform
where
the
public can deliberate
freely without fear of intimidation. At this
position
people can discuss
issues with opposing
points of view with discretion
and
still
remain critically affianced with each
other. Through such
discussion
individuals can always
reach an understanding of many
political
issues. The purpose of writing this article into discuss the
invasion of the
public
sphere
and
how
informed are we on the
same In a
.country
where
people
have
the
collective
memory, people are always
interested in the
creation of more
meaningful
and
creative
public
spheres. At this
age, many
people
still
misinterpret
the
meaning of the
word
public
sphere. After the eighteen and nineteenth centuries
the
term
public
sphere
transformed, it
was
extended to places that had
public
debates. At this
place, people can gather
and
listen to the
rational
voice of the
people. The
public
authority at the
moment
was
linked with a system of norms
and
rules. This, on the
other
hand, were
known
and
were
discussed critically until they
reached a consensus is reached basing on their rational
application
(Economou 1-26).The
mass
media is a technological idea that has transformed
the 21st century; through it
communication can reach
many
people
very
quickly
and efficiently. The
mediums of sending
this
information
include
television, music, radio
and
the
most
recent is the internet. The issue with the media is it’s owned
and
managed by private
organizations that have their own individualistic value
systems. The
values of the
companies
are usually
communicated as facts
objectively. Taking
the
example of the United States which prides itself on its superior
press
freedom
(Economou 1-26).The
freedom
is associated with the
first
amendment of the
constitution. If, for
example, a large
organization is involved in the
production of genetically modified
food
the
company has the
potential of financial
lobby
groups
and
creates an influence on the
individuals in the
journalism
business. There is no
law
that
prevents
any
private
news
corporation from doing
business with any
other
private
business
company (Manne 45-78). If
the GMO producing
company
is accused by either a group
or
individuals of doing
illegal
business, the
media
company can be influenced to spin
the
story into the
one that favors
the GMO producing
business. Most of the
companies
are muddied with self- interests. The
inner
working of the self-interested groups
prevents at the
same
time
the
production of authentic
public
sphere
who
directly
benefit from the
same
scheme. Therefore, due to lack of information
the
public will need
authentic
voice
and
the
chances of any
significant
discussion on the
same
issues are swept underneath the
powerful
companies
(Manne 45-78).A
consumer is always
understood to be an individual
who is engaged in the
act of purchasing of goods
and
accumulating them. In most
cases, we
have
seen
conflict
transforming
immediately into opportunities
for others. Recently, we
have
seen
when a country like USA is attacked by terrorist, the
government
quickly
urges
the
public to resume their role as consumers
and
continue
shopping. It
this
possible
that
terrorist might have
used
the
act to create an opportunity. At this time, there is the possibility for
corporations to make an advertisement
that
influences
the
emotions of the
people. It
this may the
political
sphere is being
intertwined
together with consumerism. The
public
sphere will always be overshadowed
mainly by the politically charged
advertisements. This
way
information will be barred from reaching
the
public
and
critical
analysis of the
matter will not come to light
(Economou 1-26).The
process of finding a proper
solution to a problem in the
modern
age with respect to the
public
sphere
is depicted in the dichotomy of what is concealed
and
what is visible in what
goes on in daily
politics. We
always
look
politics as a more
detailed
survey of exactly
how
the
society
is ordered, after this
we
then
go
ahead to assign
highly
concrete
terms to the
particular
civil
mechanism
seen
taking
place within that
particular
order. Instead of this, we should focus on the elemental experiences
seem to be different to the
humans in many
different
political
and
historical
settings. Objectifying
the
politics of the
day
directly
softens
the
conflicts that are in the
politics
(Economou 1-26).It
the
earlier
statement, it is very
clear
that by analyzing
the societal order
and
assigning
very
real
terms to particular
internal
mechanism, any
discussion is, therefore, depicted to be outside the
context
hence
totally
irrelevant. It is more
advantageous
because
it
directly
opens an opportunity
for
discussion
or
critical
debate (Manne 45-78).
Taking an objective
approach to politics
allow one to directly pinpoint the
direct
source of power, this
way, it will allow
ultimate dismembering of the
public
sphere, where a healthy
and
strong
democracy’s power
is emptied.
Hence, it
needs
constant
critical
debates. The
mass
media
and consumerism needs to directly
fit
this. The corporate news
always
uses
power to directly
objectify
the
political
discourse in order to serve their personal
agendas. Consumerism always
replaces whatever is different in people by transforming them into just
mere
customers. It is the
responsibility of the
mass
media
and consumerism to make
sure
that
people are more
informed
and
that
politics should never be an argument
but something clear
and
providing black and white answers to the
critical
questions. The
public
sphere is, therefore, in between the black and white and
it
exists in uncertainty. It is a dire
conflict
(Economou 1-26).Conclusion
accepting
the
political
field in an objective
and
more
detached
position is totally an act of lack of thinking. It is important to note
that
politics itself is conflicted in order to be able to engage in a critical
discussion. Most of the
problems
facing our political
systems are totally
intricate, totally
complicated
and
always
requires a more
critical
analysis. We as the
society cannot just
give
solutions to the
problems
that
we are facing. The
modern
world
requires a better
system
where
the
society is given a batter
structure with order
and in an objective
way
.

References Economou, N. & Tanner, and S. «The fourth
estate: liberal
democracy d ‘the
press’ (Ch. 1)…” In Media, power
and
politics Manne, R. Why Rupert Murdoch Cannot
(2008): 1-26.is stopped: the Political Empire of the News Corp Chairman. Parisers, Eli. Beware online «
2013: 45-78filter
bubbles.» 2011.