Fingerprint Evidence, Unreliable? Essay Example
Finger Print Evidence and Its Reliability
The ruling made by Judge Susan sounder rules that the forensic fingerprint identification was subjective, unverifiable identification procedure and also untested after there was a testimony made by FBI agents terming the method infallible which came after there were errors in a high profile terrorism case involving the bombing of Madrid Train in 2004. The impact of the ruling does not have too great an impact on the arena of fingerprint evidence since it was established that there is the possibility of human errors occurring during the analysis of such evidence. What is most important is that the systems of justice should work hard to weed out the use of junk science and make more use of qualified and reliable experts.
The outcome could have been different if the testimony given to the judge would have been correct and lacking in errors or if they would have let her know that there was room for errors during the analysis of the evidence in the beginning. That way during the ruling the Judge would have been more lenient in the judgment seeing as the calculation of errors is not a requirement in the use of science.
Future court cases will have to consider the possibility of errors while taking the analysis of evidence into account. There will also be the need for the experts to use research to establish the error rates and the limitations that are found in the use of certain methods in forensics. Quality assurance measures will have to be put in place to ensure errors do not occur in the future or are kept at a minimum (Crime Lab Report, Nov 2007).
Crime Lab Report. The forensic science authority for journalism, criminal justice and public policy. Special Edition: The Maryland Fingerprint Ruling. Many are to blame for Maryland Judge’s decision. November 8, 2007.
File retrieved from: http://www.latent-prints.com/images/11-2007s.htm
More Important Things