Financial vs economic table & Link impact to valuation Essay Example
- Category:Business
- Document type:Assignment
- Level:Undergraduate
- Page:2
- Words:1273
Table of Content
Financial vs. economic impacts (Wyaralong Dam Construction)
Contents
Financial vs economic impacts of Constructing the Wyaralong dama 2
Investment Appraisal technique’ Net present value 2
NPV of the project (Construction of the Wyaralong dam) 2
Cost benefit Analys of the project (Wyaralong dam) 3
BENEFITS 4
Passenger time savings 4
Valuation techniques 4
Water shrotage 4
Valuation technique: 5
Construction of the dam 5
Valuation technique: market prices 5
Loss of fisheries 6
Valuation technique: market prices 6
Financial vs. economic impacts of constructing the Wyaralong dama
Affect Financial (money) Economic (real)
Labour Labour Time wastage
Materials Market going prices Next best Options
Water quality Commercial fishing lost fish, retained inputs
Benefits
More water supply Extra pay more output
Improved human life $ savings Alternative use of water
(Reduced water shortage)
Improve environmental $ savings More water, good Health
(Reduced medical payments)
Investment Appraisal technique’ Net present value
We will use the NPV appraisal technique to evaluate our project. NPV is the difference between yearly benefit and cost adjusted for the discounting rte and sum over the project useful life. The adjustment for the discounting rate entails the multiplication of the yearly cost, benefit or the net benefit by the discounting factor. The discounting factor is different as per the discounting rate chosen and the project useful life.
NPV of the project (Construction of the Wyaralong dam)
Time is 10years
Project discounting factor is 10%
Estimated Initial outlay is $246000, 000
Estimated Net benefit of the project is $815000, 000
Therefore, the estimated project Cost and Benefit for the project is as follows
Total cost |
$ 246,000 |
||||||||||
Total benefit |
$ 100,000 |
$ 110,000 |
$ 120,000 |
$ 815,000 |
|||||||
Net benefit |
$ 109,500 |
$ 569,000 |
|||||||||
Discount factor (10%) |
|||||||||||
$ 307,039 |
From the above NPV Analysis of the project, it is evident that the construction of Wyaralong dam would lead to positive NPV of $307,039. The implication is that the construction of the dam is viable since, it will bring more benefit to the society like constant supply of clean water for basic needs and improved living standards of the people leaving around. As a result, the project must be implemented since, the benefits of contracting the dam is more than the cost.
Cost benefit Analyse of the project (Wyaralong dam)
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Wyaralong dam project Net Present Values in 2016 $ million |
|||
Definition |
Valuation |
Present Value |
|
Benefits |
|||
More water |
Cost saving from buying costly water |
Cost saved: valued at $10/litre. |
|
Water treatment cost saving |
Less time spent in looking for constant supply of clean water |
marginal operating costs by amount of water usage per day at 870% water usage per day |
|
Extra use of water |
Excess water above the normal litres required in the dam |
Water billing fee monopoly that must be shadow pricing. |
|
Economic multiplier effect |
Spending by more people as planed creates flow on effect by growht in spending to maintain the dam and water quality |
GEM multiplier adjusted to just comprise of usage assets ($455m undiscounted) |
|
Enviroment safety |
New dam will ensure that the enviroment is safe for animals living around |
Asset value methodology pre-emptive cost Contingency valuation |
|
sunk cost market price |
|||
Dam Development |
market price of inputs |
||
Operations |
Increased aircraft movements * |
market prices |
|
Lost fisheries |
The construction of the dam will destroy fish breeding grounds & cloud the water as the construction in progress |
approval of recompense Change in value of output |
|
contamination |
Water effluence will harm aquatic animals and animals living around the dam for a short period under construction. Water effluence will necessitate sanitization for business users |
Loss of aquatic life precautionary cost surrogate cost emergency assessment |
|
Water shortage |
Extra cost of buying water |
Water cost: valued at $10/litre |
|
Net benefit |
Benefits
Passenger time savings
Devoid of the new source of water, the demand for water will grow leading to poor quality of human life because of water shortage and costly water price that will exist which many may not afford. By getting rid of water shortage, the construction of Wyaralong dam will free citizens from water shortage and ensuring that every person gets the cheaply available water.
Valuation techniques
The number of water users is multiplied by the effect of water shortage and is appraised at 10/litre. As a result, water shortage factor was included. The shortage is different between people and class of people in the country, which increase as the demand for water increase and water supply decline as result of non-constant supply of water. The assumption about the new project is that the construction of new dam will ensure that there is constant supply of cheap and affordable water at every one at all time. The number of water uses is estimated to grow. The present value of the project is estimated to be $307,039,000
Water shortage
Devoid of the Wyaralong dam, the growth in the demand for clean and constant supply of water will lead to poor living standard and poor sanitation. By ensuring that there is constant supply of water, it will save life by ensuring that every gets sufficient and quality water at a cheap price.
Valuation technique:
Cost savings (loss of life and poor sanitation)
The construction of new dam will ensure that there is decline in the loss of life because of lack of water and costly water purchase of the existing water supply. The estimates are based on marginal operating cost for the dam with an assumption that the average water capacity of 70% of water storage in the dam is maintained.
Costs
Construction of the dam
The resource employed in the construction of Wyaralong dam depicts some alternative use that is lost to the community when the asset is employed in the dam construction.
Valuation technique: market prices
The construction assets are existing in a competitive market, which are ideal appraisal of the societal worth. In this regards, the market price employed in financial forecasting for the project are used.
Approximates cost of dam construction and associated facilities ($ millions April 2016 dollars) |
|||||
Year of outlay |
|||||
Reclamation |
|||||
Pavements |
|||||
Drainage |
|||||
Fencing-perimeter road |
|||||
Electrical-airfield lights |
|||||
Control tower-navigation aids |
|||||
Staffing Office |
|||||
• hangars |
|||||
• car park |
|||||
• apron |
|||||
• access road-bridge |
|||||
Rescue-fire fighting |
|||||
Relocations |
|||||
$200,000 |
$ 200,000 |
||||
Contingency |
|||||
$241,250 |
$ 460,190 |
||||
Multiplier flow-on to Sydney |
|||||
Employment (no. of jobs) |
|||||
Dam construction |
|||||
Multiplier flow-on to Sydney |
Present value in 2016 dollars is $307,039 million.
Loss of fisheries
The search in the Botany Bay for materials employed to fill the dam will pollute the water and hence affect the aquatic life. Less fish will be caught in the river in which the dam will be constructed. The loss of assets is because of the construction of the dam by blocking part of the river to save on water.
Valuation technique: market prices
Estimates of annual loss to fisheries |
||||||
Value per |
Professional |
Percentage |
||||
commercial |
to amateur |
|||||
Yellow-finned |
||||||
Tarwhine |
||||||
Luderick |
||||||
Trumpeter |
||||||
King prawns |
||||||
Value:
Present value in 2016dollars is $ 650,000.
References
, London : Cingage learning.Project Risk ManagementBarkle, B. (2004)
, Sydney: Springer.Doing a Research Project in Nursing and Midwifery: A Basic GuidComerasamy, H. (2013)
, london: Springer.Practice of Project Management — Page 353Dennis, E.F. (2005)
, London: Cingage Learning.Understanding Strategic ManagementHenry, A. (2011)
.ArgusMoran, K. (2015) ‘Floodplain needs work’,
, London: John Wiley’s & Son’s.Project Management for Environmental, Construction and ManufacturingMunier, N. (2012)
.office of enviroment Heritageoffice of enviroment Heritage (2016) ‘Project summaries — Restoration and Rehabilitation — community grants’,
, New York: Cingage Learning.Mastering Project Management Integration and ScopeSokowski, D. (2015)
, New York : John Wiley & Son’s.Project Management Communications Bible — Page 388Taylor, . (2010)
Triantis, J. (2015) Navigating Strategic Decisions: The Power of Sound Analysis , London