• Home
  • Law
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND PLANNING : BIODIVERSITY AND PLANNING

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND PLANNING : BIODIVERSITY AND PLANNING Essay Example

  • Category:
    Law
  • Document type:
    Essay
  • Level:
    Undergraduate
  • Page:
    1
  • Words:
    413

Environmental Legislation and Planning: Biodiversity and Planning

The Office of the Environment and Heritage plays an important role in putting in place interventions and policies aimed at the protection of vulnerable and endangered species. However, the processes and procedures which are used by the office are not the most efficient since they act when the damage done to the species is irreversible (EDO Fact Sheet). There are several flaws in the systems which have to be rectified if the system is to be made more effective in the protection of vulnerable and endangered species.

The system is flawed in its approach towards the listing and classification of vulnerable and endangered species. The system specifies two categories of persons that may file for a species to be deemed endangered or threatened; the scientific community or any other concerned person (Kelly et al, 37-44). The system is flawed in that the initiation process is left to private persons and the scientific community. The process of listing the species is too long and filled with a lot of red tape which may result in a species becoming even more endangered as the process seeks approval. The licensing process to harm and pick threatened process may be taken advantage of through appeals upon refusal which will result in even more endangerment (Farrier et al, 219-229).

The system may be improved through changing the persons responsible for the initiation of the process of classification of species as endangered. It would be prudent to make the government responsible for the initiation of the process since it has the resources and manpower as compared to the private sector. The process ought to be enhanced by reducing the red tape involved in the initiation and implementation of the process of classification of endangered species (Kelly et al, 37-44). Species ought to be classified as endangered in a provisional format while the bureaucratic processes are being carried out. The licensing procedures ought to be made in such a way that the directorate has final say on the licensing procedures in order to prevent species becoming even more endangered (Farrier et al, 219-229).

Works Cited

EDO Fact Sheet. Retrieved from http://www.edo.org.au/edonsw/site/factsh/fs06_1.php

Farrier, D., Whelan, R., & Mooney, C. ‘Threatened species listing as a trigger for conservation action’, Environmental Science & Policy 2007, 10: 219 — 229.

Kelly, CL., Pickering, CM., and Buckley, R.C. ‘Impacts of tourism on threatened plant taxa and communities in Australia’, Ecological Management & Restoration, 2003, 4 (1): 37- 44.