• Home
  • Performing Arts
  • Develop a report on how local Government works with the Not for Profit Sector in Western Australia

Develop a report on how local Government works with the Not for Profit Sector in Western Australia Essay Example

  • Category:
    Performing Arts
  • Document type:
    Research Paper
  • Level:
    Masters
  • Page:
    4
  • Words:
    2466

Local Government Relationship with the Not for Profit Sector in Western Australia

Introduction

In this regard, the research paper seeks to develop a report on how local government (Western Australia) works with the Not for profit Sector that identifies the services, the policy agendas, priorities and issues.. (Tyler 221) covers services and activities such as education, religious and human rights practices, community service, health, and culture. Besides, it is not easy to acquire a precise snapshot of the contribution as well as activities of the Not-for-profit sector owing to its diversity in addition to the insufficient information gatheredCarey, Knechel and Tanewski (46) it. These days, Australia’s not-for-profit sector is big and diversified, and according to (Baines, Charlesworth and Cunningham 26) offered nearly all of community services in Australia up until the World War II, not the Australian government, and such organisations were primarily religious organizations that aspired to mitigate suffering as well as povertyCockram (6). Australian not-for-profit sector has a well-built history of assisting disadvantaged as well as vulnerable Australians in our community. Not-for-profit sector according to (Moore 225)Joondalup is a town in Perth, based in Western Australia, and which consists of the council chambers for the local government and the central business district of the Joondalup city. The elected Council in the City of Joondalup (which includes the Mayor) was pointing out that the Joondalup city’s council had turn out to be dysfunctional. In this regard, the power of the council was for the moment reassigned to the Commissioners

Joondalup Local Government and NFP

. (Fogarty and Mugera 302). This may entail anything from the maintenance drainage, footpaths, streets as well as removal of rubbish through to sweeping and street lighting. The city as well runs services such as food inspection, nursing services as well as immunisation clinics and is accountable for the control dogs, parking as well as a range of other issues within Local Law (Dollery, Goode and Grant 291)Joondalup local government is a hastily developing city that was intended two decades ago, leading to a fine laid-out City comprising of residential, industrial and commercial areas. Joondalup local government is liable for providing excellent rules as well as handiness, comfort and security of individuals in the cityWALGA posit that serves more than 150,000 locals as well as manage almost 60,000 properties. Reilly the local governemnt The City of Joondalup remains to be one of the biggest as well as fastest developing local councils in Perth, and according to

, saving the local government as well as corporations in that region from offering such service themselves. Joondalup city sector offers services to people of not-for-profit region as well as make millions of dollars of fiscal activity connected to the services that they offer. Simultaneously, the Joondalup organizations employ a lot of people in the not-for-profit’s regional economy. For instance, Joondalupthese organizations together consist of a very important element of van Staden and Heslop (46) posit that organizations fulfil various community missions to enhance life quality, not-for-profit offer services for the aged and unwell persons. Nonetheless, not just dosuch as Ruah Community Services and White Oak Community Care Services offer educational opportunities or develop the locals’ cultural understanding. Still some Joondalup local government to offer shelter as well as food to disadvantaged families or employment assistance and job training. Others work hand in hand withVolunteering WAplays a progressively more significant role, since nearly all of them subsist to enhance the quality of life for all locals. A number of organizations such as City of Joondalup in the not-for-profit sector The

Case Study

Ruah Community Services is a not-for-profit community service organisation located in the city of Joondalup, and it offers different scope of services as well as programs to underprivileged and needy community members (DAO). Such services try to deal with: accommodation vulnerabilities as well as homelessness; overcoming family violence; enhancing the quality of life as well as mental health recovery; lessening the effects of poverty in addition to finding ways to mainstream opportunities; fight drug use in the community; helping former prisoners to be accepted back to the community; and helping the community to access education as well as employment opportunities (HealthInfoNet). Importantly, Ruah is dedicated to make a contribution to the aspirations as well as vision of indigenous people in the City of Joondalup, with the goal of improving life quality, culture honouring, religion, and make them have a place in Australian community. Last year, in hand with Joondalup local government, Ruah offered services and programs that were culturally secure to the people living in City of Joondalup , and the services included a life skills group, housing services, as well as a social women centre. In Western Australia, Ruah has almost 16 properties, which includes semi-detached flats, separate houses, as well as two refuges. A number of the properties are owned by Ruah, but the majority are owned by the local government of Joondalup. In Ruah Refuge, the not-for-profit organisation provides temporary accommodation for children and women who are running away from family or domestic violence (Ruah).

for mental patient, wherein Ruah’s professional mental health staffs help individuals leaving mental hospital to get and retain secure accommodation. (HASI)Accommodation Support InitiativeandHousing is engaged in a number of projects financed through the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH), and one of the project is Safe at Home Program in Perth, which offers support for women and children enduring domestic violence. Another project is Street to Home Program wherein Ruah works together with other eight Not-for-profit organisations as well as the local government to offer a wide-ranging response for rough sleepers in the City of Joondalup. Another project spearheaded by Ruah in collaboration with the local government is the Ruahon-site accommodation, crisis beds for emergency housing, as well as transitional beds. This is mainly for single indigenous women who are on the streets or in danger of being left homelessness owing to domestic violence or other life-based crises. HealthInfoNet, Ruah offers According to

Current Relationship between NFP and Joondalup Local Government

According to Cockram (7), well-built as well as vibrant communities are strengthened by strong networks of community connection, a varied scope of local interest groups, as well as human services that act in response to certain needs of the locals. However, Osborne, Jenei and Fabian (334) posit that there must be key ingredients that constitute such kinds of societies as well as how are they generated and retained. In view of the heightening service-delivery pressures in local governments with both shrinking as well as increasing populations, the need to recognize how to develop vibrant, flexible communities is more pressing than before. In Australia local governments hold interwoven constitutional accountabilities for community development, with different array of not-for-profit organisations that work across local, state, and national levels. Each of their responsibility and role are imperative, but Mayer (57) argues that not-for-profit organisation at local level as well as local government have a more devoted sense of the capabilities as well as needs of local communities. When Joondalup and Ruah work collectively at the local level, remarkable outcomes take place. The local government of Joondalup is dedicated to improve the role of not-for-profit organisations for the people living in the city of Joondalup, which includes through bracing local government commitment with the not-for-profit sector. Corresponding to this, the Joondalup local government created the Local community engagement group to give advice to the local government as to the strategies it might embark on to facilitate relationships between Joondalup local government and not-for-profit groups the city of Joondalup (WALGA).

Joondalup local government engagement with not-for-profit organisations such as Ruah has been remarkable and has benefited many locals within the city. Whereas partnerships between not-for-profit organisations and Joondalup local government has take time, it is at the moment progressively more acknowledged that such engagement is vital to significant results within the people. According to Howieson (31), local government contribution into non-for-profit organisation’s services fortifies communities by broadening the sense of ownership felt by the local inhabitants as well as heightening social inclusion. Martin (479) posits that not just does such engagement lead to communities that are more resilient, it as well brings about more resourceful utilisation of resources, improved understanding concerning the needs of the local as well as planning results that are more successful. As Dollery, Goode and Grant (294) emphasize, in a well-built local community, the local government and the not-for-profit organisations are equally supporting pillars of good governance as well as representative democracy.

This point out that Joondalup local government well comprehends the community views as well as that the community is engaged in the process of decision making, resulting into an improved provision of services. Whereas Joondalup local government used to deliver a lot of human services, these days it is more delivered by not-for-profit organisations. However, these organisations do not essentially gear to Joondalup local government plans or seek advice from with Joondalup council prior to opening its local services. In this regard, Cripps, Ewing and McMahon (11) posit that insufficient conversation between not-for-profit organisations as well as the local government can from time to time be another obscuring factor. At the same time, Joondalup local government is struggling with challenges, which includes a more competitive human services setting conquered by market values as well as more legal responsibilities. Each of such issue deserves an additional examination, mainly in the milieu of the rapid development of scores of new not-for-profit organisation all through Western Australia in addition to their urgent desire for services.

Challenges and Solutions

Local governments in Western Australia were on one occasion expected to focus on rubbish, rates, and roads, but from the duration ranging between 1960s and 1970s a distinct view surfaced with regard to local government role as well as its place within the community (Cooke 1477). Furthermore, community services like aged care, libraries, as well as maternal and child health, libraries were ever more observed as the responsibility of the local government. Cooke who at one time worked in local government, remember a heightened concern in community development in the early 80s, especially in urban municipalities. However, the past decade have seen a concentration on collaborative as well as trust relationships in the City of Joondalup and the abovementioned case study attest to this. However, practitioners who have in past worked within local government or the not-for-profit sector recognize a number of considerable transformations to the context wherein community engagement within the local government works.

Not-for-profit organisations are progressively less likely to be small, regional bodies, but rather an enormous multi-site agency. Baines, Charlesworth and Cunningham (33) argue that local government has a natural interest in the areas that enormous not-for-profit organisations do not essentially share. The main solution for this is to promote diverse forms of relationships given that a number of setbacks are more vulnerable to local government, neighbourhood, and regional solutions since this will gather not-for-profit organisations with similar interests about a mutual challenge. For instance, Ruah is collaboratively working with six municipalities in the Western Australia to put into practice the human services element of the local governments’ Strategic Plan, aspiring to re-engineer models for service delivery to associate more strongly to the locals. Evidently partnerships between the not-for-profit sector and local government can take a various forms, but they time and again share several attributes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it has been argued that every community is distinctive and somewhat faces its individual setbacks. Whereas there are enormous distinctions between local government as well as not-for-profit organisations, they mutually share a number of fundamentals, like an interest to offer quality community services to people of Western Australia. What’s more, it has been observed that Joondalup local government has searched for neighbourhood level partnerships to handle its regional issues. Given that every community has its individual attributes, local government is preferably positioned to recognize and offer for local needs, but when it works in partnership with not-for-profit organisations. What’s more, it has been observed that Joondalup local government has searched for neighbourhood level however, Joondalup municipality can just carry out this successfully in tandem with all government levels and most importantly with the not-for-profit sector.

Work Cited

Baines, Donna, Sara Charlesworth and Ian Cunningham. «Fragmented outcomes: International comparisons of gender, managerialism and union strategies in the nonprofit sector.» The Journal of Industrial Relations 56.1 (2014): 24-47.

Carey, Peter, W Robert Knechel and George. Tanewski. «Costs and Benefits of Mandatory Auditing of For-profit Private and Not-for-profit Companies in Australia.» Australian Accounting Review 23.1 (2013): 43-52.

Cockram, Judith. «The Impact of Compulsory Community Participation on the Not for Profit Sector in Western Australia.» Australian Journal on Volunteering 8.1 (2003): 5-14.

Cooke, Fang Lee. «Informal employment and gender implications in China: the nature of work and employment relations in the community services sector.» The International Journal of Human Resource Management 17.8 (2006): 1471-1487.

Cripps, Helen, Michael Ewing and Lance McMahon. «Customer Satisfaction in Local Government: The Case of the Restructured City of Perth, Australia.» Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 12.1 (2004): 1-22.

DAO. Ruah Community Services — Drug and Alcohol Office . 2014. 9 May 2014. <http://www.dao.health.wa.gov.au/Gettinghelp/ServiceDirectory/Supportedaccommodation/RuahCommunityServices.aspx>.

Dollery, Brian, Stephen Goode and Bligh Grant. «Structural Reform of Local Government in Australia: A Sustainable Amalgamation Model for Country Councils.» Space & Polity 14.3 (2010): 289-304.

Fan, Qiuyan. «An Evaluation Analysis of E-government Development by Local Authorities in Australia.» International Journal of Public Administration 34.14 (2011): 926-934.

Fogarty, James and Amin Mugera. «Local Government Efficiency: Evidence from Western Australia.» The Australian Economic Review 46.3 (2013): 300-321.

HealthInfoNet. Ruah Community Services. November 2013. 9 May 2014. <http://www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/key-resources/organisations?oid=1203>.

Howieson, Bryan. «Defining the Reporting Entity in the Not-for-profit Public Sector: Implementation Issues Associated with the Control Test.» Australian Accounting Review 23.1 (2013): 29–42.

Martin, Fiona. «The Goods and Services Tax and its effect on fund raising in the not-for-profit sector: The fate of the school fete.» Australian Business Law Review 29.6 (2001): 477-491.

Mayer, Lloyd Hitoshi. «The «Independent» Sector: Fee-for-Service Charity and the Limits of Autonomy.» Vanderbilt Law Review 65.1 (2012): 49,51-122.

Moore, Norman. «Western Australia loses its electoral identity.» Parliamentarian 86.3 (2005): 225-227.

Osborne, Stephen P, Gyorgy Jenei and Gergely Fabian. «‘Whispering at the Back Door’?: Local Government — Voluntary and Community Sector Relationships in Post-accession Hungary.» Public Policy and Administration 23.4 (2008): 331-350.

Reilly, Susanne. Minister orders City to comply. 25 June 2013. 9 May 2014. <http://joondalup.inmycommunity.com.au/news-and-views/local-news/Minister-orders-City-to-comply/7646733/>.

Ruah. Ruah Community Services. 7 August 2013. 9 May 2014. <http://www.ruah.com.au/about/>.

Tyler, Melissa Conley. «Benchmarking in the non-profit sector in Australia.» Benchmarking 12.3 (2005): 219-235.

van Staden, Chris and James Heslop. «Implications of Applying a Private Sector Based Reporting Model to Not-for-Profit Entities: The Treatment of Charitable Distributions by Charities in New Zealand.» Australian Accounting Review 19.1 (2009): 42-53.

WALGA. Western Australian Local Government Association. 7 April 2014. 9 May 2014. <http://www.walga.asn.au/>.