Dennison Plateau in New Zealand Essay Example

Dennison Plateau in New Zealand

Dennison Plateau in New Zealand

Dennison Plateau in New Zealand is experiencing a conflict between the human beings and the plants. The human being wants to clear the plateau so as to put up structures in favour of his survival. Destruction of the plateau cannot be made without the destruction of the environment and consequently the ecosystem that involves the animals, birds, and other plateau habitats (Corry, 2013). The government is behind the whole conflict since it is the one that approved the destruction of the ecosystem of the plateau. The approval led to the emergence of conflict since the destruction of ecosystem destroys the most precious mining area. Additionally, the action shows a lack of empathy for the ecosystem.

There is no need destroying the environment in the name of creating additional employment and economic activity in Dennison Plateau, New Zealand. The importance of the ecosystem need to be appreciated and that living without them is inalienable. Destruction of habitat (plant) destroys the animals and this increases the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere while decreasing the amount of oxygen. The resultant is a human being with health challenges and a tragic global warming. The government should find ways to create employment and economic activity in the same place but preserve the environment.

My answer to the question 2 above would not change even if the animal threatened by destruction of the ecosystem was a rare species of primate rather than a rare species of snail. This is because while snails are creatures that can adapt easily to the changing the environment, rare species of primate have specific natural habitat and cannot survive elsewhere. Destruction of the plateau would lead to the extinction of such rare species of primate. My answer, therefore, remains intact that ecosystem should not be destroyed for reasons of employment and economic expansion.

To me, empathy is a good basis for making sound and prudent decisions. Referring to the definition of empathy, one has to put himself/herself in the shoes of the one being addressed to understand fully what the person is undergoing (Scott, et al., 2015). Understanding the state of the other party helps in making good decisions. In this regard, I disagree that empathy is a poor basis for sound decision making.

The ecosystem has a complex and interrelated nature as well as an intricate network of interdependencies that binds it to other ecosystems. Destruction of one entity of the ecosystem affects others in the system due to its interlocked nature. Additionally, I also agree that ecosystem is a representative of a delicate balance of inter – related entities and since they are interlocked, intrusion into one automatically affects the integrity of others as well as its integrity. I am totally in agreement with the two statements. The ecosystem does not work in isolation but involves other parties and systems with which they work in tandem.

I am in agreement that any ecosystem possess a sense of interdependence with the ecosystems. From the two responses in question 5, it is clear that an ecosystem is highly interlocked and destructing it leads to serious complications. Human being depends on the forested areas for rain and good climate. This should draw empathy and lead to low conflict between the human being and the ecosystem. Without the ecosystem, it would be very difficult to live on earth and especially in Dennison Plateau in New Zealand.

References

Corry, M., 2013 . Commonwealth bay, Cape Denison, Mawson’s hut, the south magnetic pole, the French and others. Aurora Journal, 32(4), pp. 26-30.

Scott, J. M., et al., 2015. Geology and geochronology of the Sub-Antarctic Snares Islands/Tini Heke, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 58(2), pp. 202-212.