• Home
  • Visual Arts & Film Studies
  • Certainly, this article presents the argument that these detentions should be done in a more systematic manner. Despite the strong argument raised on prejudice against the Muslims, the author notes that the changes made by the U.S government to prevent a repeat of the 9/11 attacks have been necessary. This article will be useful in contributing to the presentation since it brings into perspective fresh ideas on the link between the law and the reality on terror attacks

Certainly, this article presents the argument that these detentions should be done in a more systematic manner. Despite the strong argument raised on prejudice against the Muslims, the author notes that the changes made by the U.S government to prevent a repeat of the 9/11 attacks have been necessary. This article will be useful in contributing to the presentation since it brings into perspective fresh ideas on the link between the law and the reality on terror attacks Essay Example

Laws Аllоwing Реорlе tо bе Dеtаinеd and Quеstiоnеd withоut Сhаrgе

In this article Adam Liptak explains the tremendous changes that have taken place since the 9/11 attacks. Of particular interest in this article is the manner in which the United States legislations have been reviewed to ensure that stern counter-terrorism measures are enacted. However, one of the most striking issues espoused in the article is on the treatment of suspected terrorist. The approach of dealing with terrorism since the 9/11 attacks has followed the policy of arresting and questioning suspects first and then charging them later. The author notes that over 100 people were arrested after the attacks with the charges being the claims that they were providing material support to the terrorist groups. Further, there was an increased public suspicion regarding the Muslim community, with most of the non-Muslims presuming that Muslims were generally aware of terror attacks and were in fact, in support of these attacks

This article resonates with the plight of the Muslim communities living in the United States. In the wake of the attacks, one of the countermeasures by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was inserting informants in the Muslim communities to monitor and provide any material evidence of involvement of Muslims in terror-related activities. While this served the interests of the US, this move was an explicit violation of the fundamental rights of persons living in the United States. Further, the fact that Muslims were arrested, questioned, and invariably held in confinement even without sufficient material evidence points out on the need to revise such laws.

The author of this article presents that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy – who was concerned with the matters regarding detention and arrest of individuals if they were found to be linked to the attacks – argued that the intent if these laws was not to target the Muslim community. However, it is impossible to ignore the fact that the U.S has made deliberate efforts in trying to combat terrorism through putting serious measures to monitor Muslims living in the United States.

Certainly, this article presents the argument that these detentions should be done in a more systematic manner. Despite the strong argument raised on prejudice against the Muslims, the author notes that the changes made by the U.S government to prevent a repeat of the 9/11 attacks have been necessary. This article will be useful in contributing to the presentation since it brings into perspective fresh ideas on the link between the law and the reality on terror attacks

References.

Liptak, A 2011, The 9/11 Decade: Civil Liberties, Before and After. [Online] Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/us/sept-11-reckoning/civil.html?_r=0 [9 Nov. 2015].