Assignment Essay Example


Health and Safety Legislation”

1. Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

A satellite manufacturing company is under The Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations which monitors the UK health and safety requirements. United Kingdom and safety regulation body works with three principal mechanisms, employee involvement, an enforcement agency, and self-regulation for employees. To reduce health and safety risks, the Act imposes a duty on employees to take reasonable care for his or her safety and others (Tombs, Steve, and Whyte 63).

Additionally, legislation obligates the employer as an overseer of the employees. He is entitled to provide a safe working environment, safe systems of work, appropriate training and a safe place of work. A general engineering company demands clear oversight so as to minimize health and safety risks. Enforcement of these laws can come into reality through the use of inspectors who can be empowered to conduct investigations and seized evidence. They can invade workplaces, along with backup enforcement and compel parties to answer questions, seize and monitor any hazardous substance (Tombs, Steve, and Whyte 65).

2. Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) at Work Regulations, 1992.

Tombs, Steve, and Whyte argue that, it’s the employer’s duty to provide and make sure that personal protective equipment (PPE) is utilized during the work. This equipment includes helmets and hard hats, gloves, eye protection, safety footwear, high visibility clothing and safety harnesses. In regard to a satellite company, regulations require that PPE are accurately assessed, maintained and stored properly, provision of use instructions and used correctly by employees. It’s, therefore, important for employers to manage the health and safety of their workforce effectively (73).

Tombs et al. observes that a general engineering company should understand that, PPE at Work Regulations 1992 requires that protective equipment are supplied and used at work where risks to health and safety cannot be controlled in any other way. It’s, therefore, the duty of employers and self-employed to ensure that appropriate PPE are put in use, cleaned, maintained and stored properly. Essentially, employees should be trained on how to use the PPE at work, and also instructions for the equipment should be at their disposal (68).

3. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations, 2002.

COSHH 2002 requires employers to monitor and protect employees from the exposure of hazardous substances. One of the common myths about this regulation is ‘Of course it’s safe-we’ve always done it.’ The reality is that, some diseases take years to develop either way, it’s better to change this time round. A company that deals with satellite manufacturing puts its employees at a harmful risk from metalworking fluids which grows bacteria and fungi hence contract dermatitis and asthma. A significant effect of these diseases leads to replacement of trained workers, disability allowances, and medicines, and individuals lose their jobs which is not a good thing (Tombs, Steve, and Whyte 65).

To the employers, running a business is about profits and so ensuring healthy working conditions for workers also leads to healthy profits. In a general engineering organization, many products or substances used at work can be very harmful. Products like paint, ink, glue, and lubricants hence need protective gears. In all cases, it is important to carry out a risk assessment first (Tombs, Steve, and Whyte 72). An assessment determines the level of hazards and also other possible ways to control the risk. When sourcing for PPE, specifications are very vital, and it also helps during the risks assessment. Equally, PPE at Work Regulations 1992 requires that personal protective equipment be supplied and properly used during work wherever risks to health and safety arise and can’t be controlled by any other means.

4. Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR).

These are the duties that are put on employers, self-employed and controllers of a workplace to report accidents, occupational diseases, and specified dangerous occurrences. One common feature of this category is death and injuries. Someone who has died or has been injured in a work-related accident has to be reported. RIDDOR report can only be declared when:

  • It’s a work-related accident

  • The injury is a type that is reportable

According to Tombs, Steve, and Whyte such accidents at work lead to low production since the workers will be out of work. Additionally, compensations will arise either to the deceased or hospital bills as well as, allowances. At times, the employer may seek legal advice which subjects the employer to high fines (76).

However, an important accident policy (MAPP) is required to curb such accidents. The document includes, risk assessments, training requirements, and job descriptions, plant operating procedures, etc.

In summary, the general conditions described in health and safety regulation are broadly fit to serve the purpose but only a few that serves the benefit. Regulatory problems are misunderstood and applied inappropriately. In general, proper training is what is needed to solve the risks of health and safety issues in today’s industries.

Work Cited

Tombs, Steve, and David Whyte. «Transcending the deregulation debate? Regulation, risk, and the enforcement of health and safety law in the UK.» Regulation & Governance 7.1 (2013): 61-79.