Assignment Essay Example

  • Category:
    Management
  • Document type:
    Article
  • Level:
    Masters
  • Page:
    1
  • Words:
    587

Assignment 4

Introduction

Managerial values are the rules and principles that define right and wrong behavior. Managers base their decisions on these values. The importance of such values is to create oneness of purpose, productivity and effectiveness in achieving of goals and objectives (Zgheib, 2005).

Findings

The participants who most influential in the decision were making process were those who advocated for equity and equality. Those who insisted on group solidarity had a higher voice and were listened to by all members of the group. It was clear that those who tried to earn ranks were rejected and the notion of self-importance was not welcomed. Although most participants followed their own dictates, such people as said above had to an extent some influence in the decision making process. Some participants were not pleased with this kind of influence and argued that they should not follow the dictate of others (Bingley, 2009). These individuals felt that the need for group solidarity and equal participation was more important.

The group checked everybody’s assumptions since the emphasis on involvement of all participants was loud and clear. The group discussed everyone’s proposition and incorporated all to arrive at a common ground. Positions of experts emerged and some individuals were more outstanding in the process of coming to a consensus. Some members of the group reacted positively and others in negative way. Those who reacted in a appositive way viewed the expert as an advantage to the group since he or she was already a member of the group. The expert having the history of the group and being aware of the nature of the decision to be made is an advantage. Also, they viewed the experts as being aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the group.

Those who did not embrace the influence of the expert felt that the decision making power was being transferred wholly to the expert whereas the group was wholly responsible for such a decision. Other members who were against the expert influence argued that the group member had similar skills and hence not qualified to make a decision on their behalf. (Cuthbertson & O’Connell, 2009). The group faced various difficulties in arriving at a consensus. They include time allocation, increased expenses and undesirable compromises (.

Conclusion

Objectivity refers to the ability to evaluate facts and outline the strengths and weaknesses. Failure to being objective in group decision making reduces the confidence of the group and weakens the strength of the decision. It leads to faulty decision making and the downfall of major organizations that require group decision making. The group members need to be well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the decision and the group as well. Contradictory information, misleading information and also poor information pooling can be as a result of lack of group objectivity (Academic Publishing, 2008). Quality group decisions are based on objectivity and not lack of it. The effectiveness and productivity of a group especially in terms of decision making is derived from this very important fact.

References

Academic Publishing, (2008).The 9th European Conference on Knowledge Management.

Kidmore, Academic Conferences Ltd Publishers.

Bingley, S. (2009).Australian and Canadian Managerial Values: A review. An International

Journal of Organizational Analysis. 17(2) 139-145.

Cuthbertson B. & O’Connell M., (2009). Group dynamics in recreation and leisure.

Champaigne, Illinois. Human Kinetics Publishers.

Griffin R, (2011). Fundamentals of Management. Boston, Cengage Publishers.

Zgheib, A. (2005). Managerial Ethics: An empirical study on Business Studies in the American

University of Beruit. A journal of Business Ethics 61(1) 69-78.